Jump to content

Commons:Featured picture candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Shortcut
This project page in other languages:

Other featured candidates

   📽️ Media

Skip to current candidates Skip to current candidates

Featured picture candidates

Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures.

Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 and current month.

For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election.

Formal things

Nominating

Guidelines for nominators

Please read the complete guidelines before nominating.

This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:

  • Licensing – Images licensed with solely "GFDL" or "GFDL and an NC-only license" are not acceptable due the restrictions placed on re-use by these licenses.
  • Resolution – Raster images of lower resolution than 2 million pixels (pixels, not bytes) are typically rejected unless there are strong mitigating reasons. This does not apply to vector graphics (SVGs).
    • Graphics on Commons are not only viewed on conventional computer screens. They may be used in high-resolution print versions, and the images may be cropped to focus on portions of the image. See Commons:Why we need high resolution media for more information.
  • Scans – While not official policy, Help:Scanning provides advice on the preparation of various types of images that may be useful.
  • General quality – pictures being nominated should be of high technical quality.
  • Digital manipulations must not deceive the viewer. Digital manipulation for the purpose of correcting flaws in an image is generally acceptable, provided it is limited, well-done, and not intended to deceive.
    • For photographs, typical acceptable manipulations include cropping, perspective correction, sharpening/blurring, and color/exposure correction. More extensive manipulations, such as removal of distracting background elements, should be clearly described in the image text, by means of the {{Retouched picture}} template. Undescribed or mis-described manipulations which cause the main subject to be misrepresented are never acceptable. For images made from more than one photo, you can use the {{Panorama}} or {{Focus stacked image}} templates.
    • For historic images, acceptable manipulations might include digitally fixing rips, removal of stains, cleanup of dirt, and, for mass-produced artworks such as engravings, removal of flaws inherent to the particular reproduction, such as over-inking. Careful color adjustments may be used to bring out the original work from the signs of ageing, though care should be taken to restore a natural appearance. The original artistic intent should be considered when deciding whether it is appropriate to make a change. Edits to historic material should be documented in detail within the file description, and an unedited version should be uploaded and cross linked for comparison.
  • Value – our main goal is to feature most valuable pictures from all others. Pictures should be in some way special, so please be aware that:
    • almost all sunsets are aesthetically pleasing, and most such pictures are not in essence different from others,
    • night-shots are pretty but normally more details can be shown on pictures taken at daytime,
    • beautiful does not always mean valuable.
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documents

There are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject.

Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable.

Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself.

Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well.

Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:

  • Notable in its own right: Works by major artists, or works that are otherwise notable, such as the subjects of a controversy.
  • Of high artistic merit: Works which, while not particularly well known, are nonetheless wonderful examples of their particular type or school of art.
  • Of high historic merit: The historical method values very early illustrations of scenes and events over later ones. Hence, a work of poor quality depicting a contemporaneous historical event can be nonetheless important, even if the artistic merit is relatively low. Likewise, scans or photographs of important documents – which may not be at all artistic – nonetheless may be highly valuable if the documents are historically significant. The reason for the image's historical importance should be briefly stated in the nomination, for those reviewers unfamiliar with the subject.
  • Of high illustrative merit: Works that illustrate or help explain notable subjects, for instance, illustrations of books, scientific subjects, or technical processes. The amount of artistic merit required for these will vary by subject, but, for instance, an illustration that makes the working of a complicated piece of machinery very clear need not be notable as a piece of artwork as well, whereas an illustration for a book might well be expected to reach much higher artistic standards.

Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced."

Photographs

On the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.

  • Focus – every important object in the picture should normally be sharp.
  • Exposure refers to the shutter diaphragm combination that renders an image with a tonal curve that ideally is able to represent in acceptable detail shadows and highlights within the image. This is called latitude. Images can be on the low side of the tonal curve (low range), the middle (middle range) or high side (upper range). Lack of shadow detail is not necessarily a negative characteristic. In fact, it can be part of the desired effect. Burned highlights in large areas are a distracting element.
  • Composition refers to the arrangement of the elements within the image. The "Rule of thirds" is one useful guideline. Horizons should almost never be placed in the middle, where they "cut" the image in half. Often, a horizon creating a top or bottom third of the space works better. The main idea is to use space to create a dynamic image.
    • Foreground and background – foreground and background objects may be distracting. You should check that something in front of the subject doesn't hide important elements and that something in background doesn't spoil the composition (for example that the streetlight doesn't "stand" on someone's head).
  • Movement control refers to the manner in which motion is represented in the image. Motion can be frozen or blurred. Neither one is better than the other. It is the intention of representation. Movement is relative within the objects of the image. For example, photographing a race car that appears frozen in relation to the background does not give us a sense of speed or motion, so technique dictates to represent the car in a frozen manner but with a blurred background, thus creating the sense of motion, this is called "panning". On the other hand, representing a basketball player in a high jump frozen in relation to everything else, due to the "unnatural" nature of the pose would be a good photograph.
  • Depth of field (DOF) refers to the area in focus in front of and beyond main subject. Depth of field is chosen according to the specific needs of every picture. Large or small DOF can either way add or subtract to the quality of the image. Low depth of field can be used to bring attention to the main subject, separating it from the general environment. High depth of field can be used to emphasize space. Short focal length lenses (wide angles) yield large DOF, and vice versa, long focal lenses (telephotos) have shallow DOF. Small apertures yield large DOF and conversely, large apertures yield shallow DOF.

On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.

  • Shape refers to the contour of the main subjects.
  • Volume refers to the three dimensional quality of the object. This is accomplished using side light. Contrary to general belief, front lighting is not the best light. It tends to flatten subject. Best light of day is early morning or late afternoon.
  • Color is important. Oversaturated colors are not good.
  • Texture refers to the quality of the surface of the subject. It is enhanced by side lighting… it is the "feel" to the touch.
  • Perspective refers to the "angle" accompanied by lines that disappear into a vanishing point that may or may not be inside the image.
  • Balance refers to the arrangement of subjects within the image that can either give equal weight or appear to be heavier on one side.
  • Proportion refers to the relation of size of objects in picture. Generally, we tend to represent small objects small in relation to others, but a good technique is to represent small objects large contrary to natural size relationship. For example, a small flower is given preponderance over a large mountain…. This is called inversion of scales.
Not all elements must be present. Some photographs can be judged on individual characteristics, that is, an image can be about color or texture, or color AND texture, etc.
  • Noise refers to unwanted corruption of color brightness and quality and can be caused by underexposure. It is not a desirable quality and can be grounds for opposition.
  • Symbolic meaning or relevance … Opinion wars can begin here … A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject. A good picture of a difficult subject is an extraordinary photograph.
Images can be culturally biased by the photographer and/or the observer. The meaning of the image should be judged according to the cultural context of the image, not by the cultural context of the observer. An image "speaks" to people, and it has the capacity to evoke emotion such as tenderness, rage, rejection, happiness, sadness, etc. Good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensations …

You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating.

Video and audio

Please nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates.

Set nominations

If a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:

  • Faithful digital reproductions of works notable in their own right, which the original author clearly intended to be viewed as a set. Examples: pages in a pamphlet, crops (puzzle pieces) of a prohibitively large scan, a pair of pendant paintings. Not acceptable: Arbitrary selection of sample works by an artist.
  • A sequence of images showing the passage of time. They could depict frames of a moving/changing object or a static object during different times of day or different seasons. Examples: diagrams illustrating a process, steps of a dance, metamorphosis of an insect, maps/drawings/photos of the same subject over the years (frame of view should be more or less the same).
  • A group of images depicting the same subject from different viewpoints, preferably taken under the same lighting conditions when possible. Examples: Exterior and interior of a building, different facades of a building, different interior views, obverse and inverse of a banknote/coin. Not acceptable: A selection of different rooms in a skyscraper, the facade of a church plus an organ, any images of fundamentally different scopes.
  • A group of images which show all possible variations of a particular class of object. Examples: Male and female versions of an animal (preferably in the same setting), all known species of a genus. Not acceptable: A few breeds of cats (unless they share a defining characteristic and represent all possible examples of that).


Adding a new nomination

If you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following.

Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button.

All single files:

For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2

All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".


Step 2: follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save that page.

Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg}}

Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports An image will only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.

Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using {{subst:FPC-notice|Your image filename.jpg}} -- ~~~~.

Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters.

Voting

Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed.

You may use the following templates:

  • {{Support}} ( Support),
  • {{Oppose}} ( Oppose),
  • {{Neutral}} ( Neutral),
  • {{Comment}} ( Comment),
  • {{Info}} ( Info),
  • {{Question}} ( Question),
  • {{Request}} ( Request).

You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator.

A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above.

Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:

  • No reason
  • "I don't like it" and other empty assessments
  • "You can do better" and other criticisms of the author/nominator rather than the image

Remember also to put your signature (~~~~).

Over time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}}  Keep It deserves to remain a featured picture.
{{Delist}}  Delist It does not deserve to be a featured picture anymore.

This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}}  Keep Do not replace the old image with the new image as a FP.
{{Delistandreplace}}  Delist and replace Replace the current FP with the proposed replacement.

If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box:


In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:

  • Information on the origin of the image (creator, uploader);
  • A link to the original FP nomination (it will appear under "Links" on the image description page);
  • Your reasons for nominating the image and your username.

After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.

As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose.

General rules

  1. The voting period is 9 complete days counted from the nomination. After the end of this period the result will be determined. Votes added on day 10 and after are not counted.
  2. Nominations by anonymous contributors are welcome.
  3. Contributions to discussion by anonymous contributors are welcome.
  4. Only registered contributors whose Commons accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Exception: registered users can always vote in their own nominations no matter the account age and number of edits.
  5. Nominations do not count as votes. Support must be explicitly stated.
  6. Nominators and authors can withdraw their nominated pictures at any time. This is done by adding the following template: {{Withdraw}} ~~~~. Also, remember that if more than one version is nominated, you should explicitly state which version you are withdrawing.
  7. Remember, the goal of the Wikimedia Commons project is to provide a central repository for free images to be used by all Wikimedia projects, including possible future projects. This is not simply a repository for Wikipedia images, so images should not be judged here on their suitability for that project.
  8. Rules of the 5th day based on vote counts on day number 5 (day of nomination + 5):
    1. Pictures are speedy declined if they have fewer than two support votes.
    2. Pictures are speedy promoted if they have 10 support votes or more and no oppose votes. (Note that if it takes more than five days to reach this threshold, the picture can be promoted as soon as it is reached.) This does not apply to nominations containing at least one ‘Alternative’ image – because it is possible that another image can overtake the one in the lead during the last days, such nominations are never closed early.
    3. Once either speedy criterion is reached, the voting period is considered closed, and no more votes may be added.
  9. Pictures tagged {{FPX}} may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied, provided there are no support votes other than that of the nominator.
  10. Pictures tagged {{FPD}} (FP-Denied) may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied.
  11. Only two active nominations by the same user (that is, nominations under review and not yet closed) are allowed. The main purpose of this measure is to contribute to a better average quality of nominations, by driving nominators/creators to choose carefully the pictures presented to the forum.

Featuring and delisting rules

A candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:

  1. Appropriate license (of course)
  2. At least seven  Support votes (or 7  Delist votes for a delist) at the end of nine days
  3. Ratio of supporting/opposing votes at least 2/1 (a two-thirds majority); same for delist/keep votes
  4. Two different versions of the same picture cannot both be featured, but only the one with higher level of support, as determined by the closer. Whenever the closer is not sure which version has consensus to be featured, they should attempt to contact the voters to clarify their opinions if not clear from the nomination page.
  5. Only two active delisting nominations per user, which is in addition to the limit of two active regular nominations.

The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5.

The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules.

Above all, be polite

Please don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care.

Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken.

See also

Table of contents

List may contain works considered Not Safe for Work (nudity).

Nominators are requested, out of courtesy, to include the {{Nsfw}} template with such images. Users may select the gadget in user preferences "Deferred display of images tagged with {{Nsfw}} on COM:FPC" to enable the template's effect of hiding the image until selected.

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
Shortcut

File:Apogónido (Cheilodipterus quinquelineatus), mar Rojo, Egipto, 2023-04-17, DD 150.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2025 at 18:43:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Five-lined cardinalfish (Cheilodipterus quinquelineatus), Red Sea, Egypt

File:Cesena - Abbazia di Santa Maria del Monte - Interno - Cupola ottagonale - 2025-09-29 19-58-00 001.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2025 at 17:36:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Octagonal dome, Santa Maria del Monte's Abbey, Cesena, Italy.

File:Kalyan Minaret, Bukhara (Минарет Калян в Бухаре, Minorai Kalon).jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2025 at 07:50:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kalyan Minaret, Bukhara

File:Hans' Millions 1.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2025 at 22:29:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Ehrenfels Castle - 1.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2025 at 17:49:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ehrenfels Castle from opposite side of Rhine

File:Neoscona oaxacensis Coacalco 251014p1.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2025 at 15:54:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Auto-Union Typ C IAA 2025 DSC 2008.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2025 at 15:50:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Himalayan Tahr at Sagarmatha National Park, Nepal 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2025 at 15:06:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Himalayan Tahr at Sagarmatha National Park, Nepal

File:Pickhubenbrücke, Kleines Fleet und St. Katharinen (2025)-L1000197.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2025 at 08:25:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of the Pickhuben Bridge, the Kleine Fleet, and St. Catherine’s Church in Hamburg

File:Freihafenelbbrücke bei Nacht 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2025 at 07:05:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Northern Elbe bridge at Hamburg by night

File:Historic Pagoda Style Architecture in Kathmandu Durbar Square-IMG 4069.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2025 at 03:45:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
-Thank for review, I have updated the info -Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 09:39, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dogwood52 - week8 - Panorama (24884860720).jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2025 at 02:44:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Taken in the blue hour, this is a 6-shot long exposure panorama of a neighborhood in Gramado - RS - Brazil.

File:ОУ „Христијан Тодоровски Карпош“ - Челопек 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2025 at 20:37:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The portico of the Hristijan Todorovski Karpoš Primary School in the village of Čelopek

File:Amal and George Clooney-69743.jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2025 at 17:56:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Amal and George Clooney at the 2024 Venice Film Festival

File:Two Red Panda Cubs in the Tree 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2025 at 17:28:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Two Red Panda (Ailurus fulgens) cubs perched in a tree at Langtang National Park, Nepal.

File:20250502 Bäckerstraße 7 Vienna 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2025 at 15:45:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View up to the sky from the courtyard of the Bäckerstraße 7 in Vienna, Austria

File:20250704 Aeonium smithii.jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2025 at 13:14:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Three Smith's Giant Houseleek inflorescences growing out of rocks in the Jardín del Centro de Visitantes de El Portillo, Tenerife, Spain

File:Parco Regionale dei Colli Euganei 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2025 at 06:28:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View from Via Sottovenda, Euganean Hills: Monte Rusta, Monte Cero and Monte Castello

File:Drake Lesser Scaup (Aythya affinis) Barengat Inlet, New Jersey, USA.jpg

Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2025 at 23:03:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Drake Lesser Scaup (Aythya affinis)

File:Hen Lesser Scaup (Aythya affinis), Barnegat Inlet, New Jersey, USA.jpg

Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2025 at 23:05:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Drake Lesser Scaup (Aythya affinis)

File:016 Ocelot in Encontro das Águas State Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2025 at 21:55:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ocelot in Encontro das Águas State Park

File:2025-10-11 D500-920 Achim-Lammerts Kuehneromyces-mutabilis.jpg

Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2025 at 17:00:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A group of fresh sheathed woodtuft (Kuehneromyces mutabilis) on dead wood in a mixed forest near Rheinzabern.
  • Thank you for sharing your story about the lens - it's great to hear how such an old but well-loved lens can still surprise you with its capabilities! I also wanted to highlight that my previous comment was sincere - I really find this mushroom cluster very fresh and lively. I hadn't noticed any post-processing sharpening; I just wanted to highlight that the caps look beautifully crisp, which I especially appreciated about the image. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 06:50, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, I know, everything's fine. My comment wasn't meant as a defense, but only referred to the lens, my surprise at how sharp it is, and how silly I've been not to use it. I now want to work with it a little more instead of carrying it around unused. Syntaxys (talk) 08:43, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you so much for sharing! I realize I may have misunderstood your first comment, and I certainly didn't mean to imply anything about post-processing. It's really wonderful to see how much enjoyment and care you put into using your lens, and it truly shows in images like this vibrant mushroom cluster. Best :) -- Radomianin (talk) 09:05, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: There was a small misunderstanding due to automatic translation - all good now, and I'm really glad it cleared up :) -- Radomianin (talk) 18:12, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ford Focus RS Mk III 2015 003.jpg

Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2025 at 12:50:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ford Focus RS Mk III
  • It is obviously taken from another vehicle just in front of this one. Yann (talk) 18:02, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    In this day and age when just about everything is photographed and available online, you have this little function called "Search with Google Lens". I right-clicked on this photo, framed the top portion of the photo and let the function make a search. Sure enough, some random guy on Flickr has the same view in a couple of photos tagged as shot in Albarracín, Aragón, Spain. Also, I don't worry about the date on the photo. The marketing team usually gets going as soon a a new model is in the works. It's often way before the campaign and the car hits the open market, and they might not check the time stamp on their photos very often since that is not their main concern. Some intern could simply have botched resetting the camera. The timestamp is midday in July, and yet we have a dusk/dawn and morning/evening mist. I doubt very much that this is one shot. Because even if you manage to pan the car for 5 sek, the wheels would still be moving and blurred, and here you can clearly see the threads. It's a composite; road photo + car standing still. Why on earth would a marketing department do a shot the hard way when they don't need to, unless the hard part was part of the campaign. --Cart (talk) 20:59, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Many thanks for your thorough research and interpretation, Cart! – Aristeas (talk) 10:15, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for your research. I added a mention about this, and withdrawn. Yann (talk) 14:51, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support - Wonderful composition and execution.The subject is in sharp focus, the background captures the sense of motion without blurring the vehicle. Well executed, with the road crating leading lines to the mountains in the background. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:47, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination per Cart's evaluation. Yann (talk) 14:51, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What mostly mazed me was the lighting. The sunset behind the car doesn't match at all with the bright areas in the car. The car was lit from several angles Poco a poco (talk) 19:49, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Baird's sandpiper (Calidris bairdii) 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2025 at 12:15:18 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Baird's sandpiper (breeding plumage)

File:Rhön (Soisberg).jpg

Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2025 at 10:27:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Rhön Mountains seen from the lookout tower on the Soisberg

File:Pantheon Rom 1 cropped.jpg

Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2025 at 09:46:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Pantheon in Rome, Italy.

File:Peach-Sitia-Crete.jpg

Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2025 at 05:20:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Peach on a rock. In the background the trunk of an old Koroneiki olive tree. Sitia, Crete, Greece.

File:Doberaner Münster, NW view, 2025-06-25.jpg

Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2025 at 04:59:41 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Doberan Minster in the golden hour

File:Reformierte Kirche Scuol. 11-10-2024. (actm.) 03.jpg

Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2025 at 04:56:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

Scorpaenopsis oxycephala

Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2025 at 20:59:20 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page

  • Front view
    Front view
  • Lateral view
    Lateral view

File:Paris - Colonne de Juillet - vues du sud - 2025-10-10 22-19-28 001.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2025 at 20:56:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Colonne de Juillet, Paris (1830).
  • Thanks, Basile, for your careful observation! I haven't noticed the artifacts myself - they may have resulted from the initial selection, but Terragio67 can easily address them. I appreciate both your feedback and Terragio67's effort in improving the image. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 08:14, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Стаклењак, Ботаничка башта Јевремовац (greenhouse Jevremovac Botanical Garden, Belgrade, Serbia).jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2025 at 19:46:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Greenhouse in Jevremovac Botanical Garden, Belgrade, Serbia.

File:Мыс Тегетхофф на остров Галля.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2025 at 16:01:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Volcanic plugs near the southern end of Hall Island, Franz Josef Land Nature Reserve, Primorsky District, Russia
I have been aware of Exiv2 and ExifTool for a long time, but ExifTool is more widely known now. These utilities can edit and extract EXIF, GPS, IPTC, XMP, JFIF, and other metadata from a large number of file formats, including raw image and video files. This includes XMP metadata from Adobe Lightroom and possibly other processors, such as Capture One, DxO PhotoLab, and Darktable. You can find and download it online: ExifTool by Phil Harvey. For this image the values of interest are: Saturation Adjustment Blue: +18, Vibrance: +32, Clarity 2012: +34. The blue adjustments are over the top when combined with global vibrance value. This explains why the sky and the shadows on snow look so strange in this file. --Argenberg (talk) 10:51, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Just as Argenberg stated, ExifTool is the de facto standard for exploring all kinds of metadata in image files. Just install and try it. ExifTool is a library plus a CLI application, of course, but as soon as you have found out how to start up the terminal and to type exiftool -g <filename/file path>, you will not want to miss it again. For more details, see Running ExifTool on the website. And ExifTool can do many more things, e.g. you can use it to fix wrong metadata (like the date/time, if your camera’s clock was off), to embed missing ICC colour profiles, etc. – There are various GUIs (graphical user interfaces) for ExifTool, e.g. ExifToolGui (Windows), so one can avoid the use of the CLI, but to explore the full power of ExifTool the CLI is preferable. – The Exiftool website hosts also the most comprehensive source of information about Exif/IPTC/XMP tags and related metadata. – Aristeas (talk) 13:16, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Interestingly, these tools have become so powerful in recent decade that in addition to regular EXIF/ IPTC/XMP data they can interpret hidden MakerNotes metadata in the original raw files from various cameras, often via reverse engineering where specifications are not officially published by camera manufactures. I remember getting some fancy calibration information from files of some of my cameras, such as the battery charge level, battery temperature, battery voltage, camera/sensor temperature, reported lens hyperfocal distance, lens focus distance, focusing points, and so on, including vast amounts of undecoded low level data. --Argenberg (talk) 19:51, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clementinum baroque library 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2025 at 16:01:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Baroque Library Hall located in the Clementinum complex in Prague, Czechia

File:Greater Caucasus Range, Caucasus Mountains, Dombay, Karachay-Cherkessia.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2025 at 11:00:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Greater Caucasus Range with peaks and glaciers in the Dombay-Ulgen and Amanauz realms.

File:Young priests at the Budhanilkantha Temple in Nepal-070A7872.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2025 at 11:02:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Чешма во Башибос 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2025 at 10:23:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A memorial pump dedicated to the success achieved by the Bulgarian military forces on the Macedonian front during World War I in the village of Bašibos

File:Varanus komodoensis, Komodo Island, Indonesia, 20250822 1319 2749.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2025 at 08:38:33 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Close-up of a Komodo dragon with its mouth open

File:Malooti Shib Mandir Complex Temple02 02.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2025 at 06:01:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The second temple with a broken roof of the Shib Mandir complex in Malooti.

File:007 Hyacinth macaw couple under Pink Ipê tree in Encontro das Águas State Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2025 at 22:29:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hyacinth macaw couple under Pink Ipê tree in Encontro das Águas State Park

Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2025 at 19:12:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Genex Tower seen from abandoned multistorey car park, Belgrade
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:05, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Serbia

Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2025 at 18:36:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Crowned lapwing (Vanellus coronatus), Amboseli National Park, Kenya
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:08, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Vanellus

File:Mosquee Douiret Vue 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2025 at 07:56:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, ehem. Sondermunitionslager Visbeck, Wachturm -- 2025 -- 0028.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2025 at 04:36:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Watchtower “Charly,” special ammunition depot Dülmen-Visbeck, Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

File:Zitting Cisticola in Bhigwan August 2025 by Tisha Mukherjee 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2025 at 13:27:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cisticola juncidis (Zitting Cisticola)

File:Kaiserschleuse Ostfeuer - Kleiner Glockenturm - Pingelturm - Bremerhaven 03.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2025 at 08:22:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pingelturm, Lighthouse Kaiserschleuse with fog bell, built in 1900;Bremerhaven, Germany

File:Short-toed Snake-Eagle in Bhigwan August 2025 by Tisha Mukherjee 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2025 at 07:17:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Circaetus gallicus (Short-toed Snake-Eagle)

File:Tyler Connolly performing with Theory of a Deadman, Hogs for Hospice, Leamington, Ontario, 2025-08-01 67.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2025 at 18:57:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tyler Connolly of Theory of a Deadman performing in 2025

ALT

File:Norderney, Promenade, Feld L -- 2025 -- 9016.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2025 at 13:41:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sign for the beach chair field L, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany
  • Wouldn't a more interesting typeface make the photo less minimalist, by drawing away attention from the overall shapes and colours? When I first looked at this image, I focused on the meaning of the signs. After a translation revealed their mundane meaning about renting beach chairs, my mind was free to enjoy the rest of the composition --Julesvernex2 (talk) 06:46, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • I find your comment remarkable. I see the photo as a whole, while you focus on details that I find much less important. Of course, typography is important. When I typeset texts with LaTeX, I also have a different focus. Here I see a round and a square sign (a minor contrast) that appeals to the viewer. In my opinion, the text is irrelevant, but the simplicity of the sign fits well. --XRay 💬 09:22, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Basile is certainly right that just referring to minimalism is not enough, we also have to mention why exactly this photo is a successful example of minimalist photography. So my “me too” was a bit lazy, sorry. For me the appeal of this photo is (i) in the clear composition (vertically four stripes: ¼ blue sky, ½ sky with clouds and sign, ¼ ground with grass; horizontally clear asymmetrical division in just two parts by the sign); (ii) in the select colours which give a very harmonic impression; and (iii) in the contrast of the natural forms of the grass (complex, wild natural forms with linear, vertical tendency) and of the clouds (less complex, rounded natural forms with horizontal tendency) with the artificial, rigid shape of the man-made sign (elementary form, vertical tendency). The simple shapes of the letters, esp. of the prominent capital L, fit very well with the overall rather geometrical shape of the sign; if the L would use a more ornate typeface, this would not work as well. (Although a severe neoclassical roman type, best a Bauer Bodoni or Didot, would also give a nice contrast ;–). – Aristeas (talk) 10:49, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's perhaps "cluttered minimalism". Because the blue sign (with icon) takes too much place. And because white foreground on white background makes the whole complicated. At the end, it's just a standard road sign -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:27, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:03, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Minimalism


Timetable (day 5 after nomination)

Thu 09 Oct → Tue 14 Oct
Fri 10 Oct → Wed 15 Oct
Sat 11 Oct → Thu 16 Oct
Sun 12 Oct → Fri 17 Oct
Mon 13 Oct → Sat 18 Oct
Tue 14 Oct → Sun 19 Oct

Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)

Sun 05 Oct → Tue 14 Oct
Mon 06 Oct → Wed 15 Oct
Tue 07 Oct → Thu 16 Oct
Wed 08 Oct → Fri 17 Oct
Thu 09 Oct → Sat 18 Oct
Fri 10 Oct → Sun 19 Oct
Sat 11 Oct → Mon 20 Oct
Sun 12 Oct → Tue 21 Oct
Mon 13 Oct → Wed 22 Oct
Tue 14 Oct → Thu 23 Oct

The bot

Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.

Manual procedure

Any experienced user may close requests.

  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
    {{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}}
     (for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
  2. Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag featured or not featured – for example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
    becomes
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured ===
  3. Save your edit.
  4. If it is featured:
    • Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
    • Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
    • Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
      • If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the com-nom parameter. For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
      • If the image is already featured on another Wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
    • Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
      • The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
      • You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
    • Add == FP promotion ==
      {{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the nominator. For set nominations, use:
      == Set Promoted to FP ==
      <gallery>
      File:XXXXXX.jpg
      File:XXXXXX.jpg
      </gallery>
      {{FPpromotionSet2|YYYYY}}      , using the names of the set files instead of the XXXXXX and the title of the set instead of YYYYY.
    • Add == FP promotion ==
      {{FPpromotedUploader|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the user who has uploaded the image, if that user is not the same as the nominator.
    • Add == FP promotion ==
      {{FPpromotedCreator|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the creator, if the author is a different Commons user than nominator and uploader.
  5. As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
    {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
    Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/October 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.

Closing a delisting request

  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
    {{FPC-delist-results-reviewed|delist=x|keep=x|neutral=x|delisted=yes/no|sig=~~~~}}
    (for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Ensifera ensifera (22271195865).jpg)
  2. Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
    delisted or not delisted
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted ===
  3. Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/October 2025.
  4. If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
    1. Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
    2. Edit the picture's description as follows:
      1. In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes). If the image description page uses the old {{Featured picture}} template, replace it with {{Assessments|featured=2}}.
      2. Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
      3. Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
    3. Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture must not be removed from the chronological list.
  5. If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.

Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination

  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
    {{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}}
  2. Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
    not featured
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
    becomes
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured ===
  3. Save your edit.
  4. Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
    {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
    Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/October 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates&oldid=1079770621"