Commons:Quality images candidates

Shortcut

• COM:QIC

↓ Skip to nominations ↓

These are the candidates for becoming quality images. This is not the same thing as featured pictures. If you want informal feedback on your photos, please ask at Commons:Photography critiques.

Purpose

The purpose of quality images is to encourage the people that are the foundation of Commons, the individual users who provide the unique images that expand this collection. While featured pictures identifies the absolute best of all the images loaded into Commons, Quality images sets out to identify and encourage users’ efforts in providing quality images to Commons. Additionally, quality images should be a place to refer other users to when explaining methods for improving an image.

Guidelines

All nominated images should be the work of Commons users.

For nominators

Below are the general guidelines for Quality images; more detailed criteria are available at Image guidelines.

Image page requirements

1. Copyright status. Quality image candidates have to be uploaded to Commons under a suitable license. The full license requirements are at Commons:Copyright tags.
2. Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
3. Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description.
4. No advertisements or signatures in image. Copyright and authorship information of quality images should be located on the image page and may be in the image metadata, but should not interfere with image contents.

Creator

Proposed wording changes to specifically exclude AI generate media from being eligable for QI see discussion

Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible unless the photographer is a Commons user. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.

Technical requirements

More detailed criteria are available at Commons:Image guidelines.

Resolution

Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media. This rule excludes vector graphics (SVG) or computer-generated images that have been constructed with freely-licensed or open software programs as noted in the image's description.

Image quality

Digital images can suffer various problems originating in image capture and processing, such as preventable noise, problems with JPEG compression, lack of information in shadow or highlight areas, or problems with capture of colors. All these issues should be handled correctly.

Composition and lighting

The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed.

Value

Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.

How to nominate

Simply add a line of this form at the top of Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list Nominations section:

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description  --~~~~ |}}

The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.

If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below:

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}

Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.

Number of nominations

No more than five images per day can be added by a single nominator.

Note: If possible, for every picture you nominate, please review at least one of the other candidates.

Evaluating images

Any registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination. For an easier evaluation you can activate the gadget QICvote

When evaluating images the reviewer should consider the same guidelines as the nominator.

How to review

Carefully review the image. Open it in full resolution, and check if the quality criteria are met.

• If you decide to promote the nomination, change the relevant line from

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}

to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Promotion|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you liked it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Promotion and add your signature, possibly with some short comment.

• If you decide to decline the nomination, change the relevant line from

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}

to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Decline|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you didn't like it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Decline and add your signature, possibly with a statement of the criteria under which the image failed (you can use titles of section from the guidelines). If there are many problems, please note only 2 or 3 of the most severe, or add multiple problems. When declining a nomination please do explain the reasons on the nominator’s talk page – as a rule, be nice and encouraging! In the message you should give a more detailed explanation of your decision.

Note: Please evaluate the oldest images first.

Grace period and promotion

If there are no objections within a period of 2 days (exactly 48 hours) from the first review, the image becomes promoted or fails according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.

How to execute decision

QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.

If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then consider also nominating the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.

Manual instructions (open only in cases of emergency)

If promoted,

1. Add the image to appropriate group or groups of Quality images page. The image also needs to be added to the associated sub pages, only 3–4 of the newest images should be displayed on the main page.
2. Add {{QualityImage}} template to the bottom of image description page.
3. Move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 2025.
4. Add the template {{File:imagename.jpg}} to the user’s talk page.

If declined,

1. move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 2025.

• Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
• Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
• Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red

Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)

Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 14 2025 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.

Consensual review process

Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.

How to ask for consensual review

To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.

Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you cannot make a decision, add your comments but leave the candidate on this page.

Consensual review rules

See Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules

Page refresh: purge this page's cache

Nominations

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures will only work on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 21:23, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

• Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC)
• Please insert a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries
• Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first; many are still unassessed
• If you see terms with which you are unfamiliar, please see explanations at Photography terms

Please nominate no more than 5 images per day and try to review on average as many images as you nominate (check here to see how you are doing).

October 14, 2025

• 
  • Nomination Pavlovsky Avenue (Martyshkino) --Lvova 18:16, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 18:44, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: A street in Lomonosov --Lvova 18:16, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: West wall of Muhammad Aminkhan Madrasah, Khiva, Uzbekistan --PetarM 17:58, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination "Ao Jardineiro de Deus", Gonçalo Ribeiro Telles memorial, Parque do Corredor Verde, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 17:57, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Interesting. --Gower 18:08, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 18:12, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building half in shadow and half in sunshine, Rua do Sol a Santana, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 17:57, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 18:12, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building detail, Pavilhão de Portugal, Parque das Nações, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 17:57, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    In this case, I'm not passionate about this picture, although I find it very interesting, especially because of the grid pattern. One question: don't you see CAs, at least in the right-hand column on the outside? --Lmbuga 19:10, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
    Yes I was aware that it was a bit borderline. But now, Julesvernex2 did a correction ! --Sebring12Hrs 19:29, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. In any case, the quality is good and the possible CAs are not important. --Lmbuga 20:05, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Foraging juvenile common blackbird (Turdus merula), Quinta das Conchas e dos Lilases, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 17:57, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Very good quality. --Gower 18:08, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 18:12, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Flag at half-mast with funeral wreath following the death of Patrizia Paradiso, Instituto Superior Técnico (Alameda), Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 17:57, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Octagonal dome, St.Maria del Monteìs Abbey, Cesena, Italy. --Terragio67 17:45, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Harlock81 17:54, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The street sign of the Anna-Wödl-Weg on the Otto-Wagner-Areal --FlocciNivis 16:24, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 18:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A sunset at the area leading up to the Allianz Arena in Munich-Fröttmaning, Germany --FlocciNivis 16:24, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:07, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from the Plaza Viera y Clavijo to the hotel building Bahia Principe San Felipe in Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 16:24, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 18:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: A Collard-dove on a turquoise railing in Icod de los Vinos, Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 16:24, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Dove is in focus, but how about tighter cropping? Now bananas are bigger than the bird. --Gower 16:42, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
    It's a good photo, but it might need cropping. --Lmbuga 18:39, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A bunker located at the coast of Abades, Arico, Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 16:24, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Interesting. --Gower 16:42, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Perched sunning anhinga in Florida. --Serebit 16:15, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, but in my opinion a crop 1x1 could improve it. --Lmbuga 18:49, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Church in Rajcza, Poland. --Gower 16:04, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    It is a little underexposed overall, especially the background. Can you correct? --Acroterion 17:09, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Park sculpture in Kachel Park, Bytom. --Gower 16:04, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, but I think the sharpness is almost lacking. --Lmbuga 18:25, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gazebo, Golcówka hill, Imielin. --Gower 16:04, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    In my opinion it's, for this size, blurry --Lmbuga 18:31, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose I don't think it's recoverable. --Lmbuga 18:46, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Bytom, 40 Krakowska Street, tenement house. --Gower 16:04, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Can you correct the perspective, especially in the left side? --Acroterion 17:08, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
     Done?, look now. Bytom is a coal-mining town, and not every building is perfectly straight ;) --Gower 18:12, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wayside cross in Piekary Śląskie-Szarlej. --Gower 16:04, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry, significant areas of the wayside cross blown out --Lmbuga 18:17, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Fountain statue of a lion --Romainbehar 16:04, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Could you reduc clipped blacks? Generally the rest is fine. --Gower 16:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
    There is a red pixel error at full size. See note. Otherwise good. --Sebring12Hrs 17:59, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Allegorical statues --Romainbehar 16:04, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Well done. --Gower 16:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Volkswagen Touareg in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 15:59, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Audi A3 Allstreet in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 15:59, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Italy, Sicily, Cefalù, Cathedral --Berthold Werner 15:51, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Could you reduce clipped whites/blacks? Otherwise it's OK. --Gower 16:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Italy, Sicily, Cefalù, Cathedral --Berthold Werner 15:51, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Could you reduce red chromatic aberration and clipped whites/blacks? Otherwise it's OK. --Gower 16:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Italy, Sicily, Cefalù --Berthold Werner 15:51, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Nice view. --Gower 16:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Citroën Berlingo III in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 15:24, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Nissan Sentra (B18) in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 15:24, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Volkswagen T-Roc Cabriolet in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 15:24, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination 2014 Mitsubishi eK Space Custom G --TTTNIS 13:39, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 15:52, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Rear view of 2014 Mitsubishi eK Space Custom G --TTTNIS 13:39, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Rear view of Toyota Raize Z --TTTNIS 13:39, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Rear view of 2013 Daihatsu Tanto Custom RS --TTTNIS 13:39, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: 1995 Nissan Primera 2.0Tm S Selection --TTTNIS 13:39, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination 9 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 1 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 12:10, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:44, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 9 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 12:10, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:45, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 9 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 3 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 12:10, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:45, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 9 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 4 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 12:10, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:46, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 9 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 5 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 12:10, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:47, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination demonstration of a motorized surfboard at Interboot 2023 --MB-one 10:54, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:09, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Highly customized Daihatsu Hijet 100 at Essen Motor Show 2023 --MB-one 10:54, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:09, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vsf TX-1200 touring bicycle at Cyclingworld Europe 2024 in Meerbusch --MB-one 10:54, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:09, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Main foyer of Ribnitz town hall --MB-one 10:54, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:48, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination LNG-powered Scania R410 semi-trailer tractor --MB-one 10:54, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:09, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Walls of Spaso-Yevfimiyev Monastery, Suzdal --Vsatinet 09:59, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Nice but slightly tilted --Gower 10:25, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
    Thank you.  Done Fixed. --Vsatinet 21:15, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Plaque of Transito dos gramaticos street, Santiago de Compostela. Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 09:43, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 10:22, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Capital on a house on Rúa de Tras Salomé, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 09:43, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:50, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Capital on a house on Rúa de Tras Salomé, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 09:43, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:50, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Capital on a house on Rúa de Tras Salomé, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 09:43, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 10:22, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Capital on a house on Rúa de Tras Salomé, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 09:43, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:50, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Horned lark --Stephan Sprinz 09:35, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Astonishing, but yellow artifacts around feathers to remove --Gower 10:22, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination White-rumped sandpiper (Calidris fuscicollis) --Stephan Sprinz 09:35, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 09:46, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Baird's sandpiper (breeding plumage) --Stephan Sprinz 09:35, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 09:46, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
    Wonderful! --Gower 10:25, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ripple marks at sunset --Stephan Sprinz 09:35, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 09:49, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Yellow mountain saxifrage in it's habitat --Stephan Sprinz 09:35, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 09:46, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Interior of Église Saint-Martin d'Anctoville-sur-Boscq, Manche, France --AFBorchert 09:22, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 09:42, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Interior of Église Saint-Martin d'Anctoville-sur-Boscq, Manche, Franc --AFBorchert 09:22, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 09:42, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Interior of Église Saint-Martin d'Anctoville-sur-Boscq, Manche, Franc --AFBorchert 09:22, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 09:42, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vase de fleurs - Antonio Ponce --GoldenArtists 08:56, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Nicely done, good quality. --AFBorchert 09:28, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cross-section, wood of Sonneratia alba - bois de Palétuvier soleil blanc --Ercé 08:45, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:01, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Small Dome of Devonaboy mosque, Andijan, Uzbekistan --PetarM 08:25, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 08:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vervet monkey (Chlorocebus pygerythrus), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 08:22, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 09:39, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vervet monkey (Chlorocebus pygerythrus), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 08:22, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 09:29, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Vervet monkey (Chlorocebus pygerythrus), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 08:22, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Capped wheatear (Oenanthe pileata), Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania --Poco a poco 08:22, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Discussion
     Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:01, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Head, eyes, beak - not sharp. Other photo of this bird is sharp. --E bailey 14:44, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
    I applied some additional sharpness --Poco a poco 19:28, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Capped wheatear (Oenanthe pileata), Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania --Poco a poco 08:22, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:47, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Kazan Voronkov — Kalyagin House --Mike1979 Russia 08:04, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Could you reduce clipped whites/blacks? Otherwise it's OK. --Gower 16:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kazan Okonishnikov House --Mike1979 Russia 08:04, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:01, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Kazan Bauman Str 45 House --Mike1979 Russia 08:04, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Kazan Brening Pharmacy Detail --Mike1979 Russia 08:04, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 09:29, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kazan Bogoroditsky Monastery Exaltation of the Cross Church --Mike1979 Russia 08:04, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --E bailey 14:46, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination fruit of Adansonia za – Fruit de Baobab za --Ercé 08:28, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 15:21, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eingangsbereich der Niedersächsischen Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek (SUB) in Göttingen --Frank Schulenburg 07:13, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. I like the composition. --Gower 16:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bay of Kotor at Muo (Kotor municipality) / Montenegro --Imehling 07:07, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Good! --Gower 16:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Gower 16:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View on Perast in Bay of Kotor / Montenegro --Imehling 07:07, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:01, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Crno Lake in Durmitor National Park --Imehling 07:07, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 16:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sedlo Pass in Durmitor National Park / Montenegro --Imehling 07:07, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Very good quality. --Gower 16:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Njegoš mausoleum on top of Jezerski Vrh --Imehling 07:07, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:17, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nave of Église Saint-Côme et Saint-Damien d'Hiesville, Manche, France --AFBorchert 07:00, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:17, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Choir of Église Saint-Côme et Saint-Damien d'Hiesville, Manche, France --AFBorchert 07:00, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Our Lady Queen of Poland and Saint Maternus church in Stronie Śląskie 1 --Jacek Halicki 06:50, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:53, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Our Lady Queen of Poland and Saint Maternus church in Stronie Śląskie 2 --Jacek Halicki 06:50, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 07:05, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Our Lady Queen of Poland and Saint Maternus church in Stronie Śląskie 3 --Jacek Halicki 06:50, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 08:09, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 9 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 1 --Jacek Halicki 06:50, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 08:08, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 9 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 2 --Jacek Halicki 06:50, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:01, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Perdicula argoondah (Rock Bush-Quail) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:28, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:01, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 07:06, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Perdicula argoondah (Rock Bush-Quail) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:28, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:01, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Perdicula argoondah (Rock Bush-Quail) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:28, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:03, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Black Drongo (Dicrurus macrocercus) in Bakkhali, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:28, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:03, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Black Drongo (Dicrurus macrocercus) in Bakkhali, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:28, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:03, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chassagne-Montrachet (Côte-d'Or, France) - Saint Mark church --Benjism89 06:03, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:12, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chassagne-Montrachet (Côte-d'Or, France) - Vineyard with the village in the background --Benjism89 06:03, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:12, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chassagne-Montrachet (Côte-d'Or, France) - Vineyard with the village in the background --Benjism89 06:03, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:12, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Santenay (Côte-d'Or, France) - View from the Sène hill : the villages of Santenay, Remigny and Chagny --Benjism89 06:03, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 16:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Santenay (Côte-d'Or, France) - View from the Sène hill : villages of Santenay and Remigny --Benjism89 06:03, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:02, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Capenter bee on a cosmos flower --Ermell 05:58, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:08, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Variable crab spider on the flower of a sunflower --Ermell 05:58, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 07:07, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Leather bug (Coriomeris denticulatus) on a bishop's weed flower (Ammi majus) in a garden in Bamberg --Ermell 05:58, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:09, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:12, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Honey bee (Heriades truncorum) on an anemone flower in a garden in Bamberg --Ermell 05:58, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:35, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pearl-bordered fritillary (Boloria selene) on a thistle flower --Ermell 05:58, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:35, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Footbridge over the Drac Noir upstream from Prapic (Hautes-Alpes, France) --Pline 05:56, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:35, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Drac noir Valley upstream from Prapic (Hautes-Alpes, France) --Pline 05:56, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:35, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Drac noir Valley upstream from Prapic (Hautes-Alpes, France) --Pline 05:56, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 09:51, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Drac noir Valley upstream from Prapic (Hautes-Alpes, France) --Pline 05:56, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:02, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fireweed in the Drac Noir Valley near Prapic (Hautes-Alpes, France) --Pline 05:56, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 09:51, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Kraków, Budynek Feniksa w Krakowie (Rynek Główny)Ja, właściciel praw autorskich do tego dzieła, udostępniam je na poniższej licencjiTa fotografia została przesłana w ramach projektu Wiki Lubi Zabytki będącego częścią inicjatywy Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Igor123121 05:50, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
     Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:02, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
    Good, but how about tighter cropping to expose the sculpture? --Gower 16:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki w KrakowieJa, właściciel praw autorskich do tego dzieła, udostępniam je na poniższej licencjiTa fotografia została przesłana w ramach projektu Wiki Lubi Zabytki będącego częścią inicjatywy Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Igor123121 05:50, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Kraków, Kościół św. Michała Archanioła i św. Stanisława Biskupa w KrakowieJa, właściciel praw autorskich do tego dzieła, udostępniam je na poniższej licencjiTa fotografia została przesłana w ramach projektu Wiki Lubi Zabytki będącego częścią inicjatywy Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Igor123121 05:50, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:55, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kraków, Kościół św. Michała Archanioła i św. Stanisława Biskupa w KrakowieJa, właściciel praw autorskich do tego dzieła, udostępniam je na poniższej licencjiTa fotografia została przesłana w ramach projektu Wiki Lubi Zabytki będącego częścią inicjatywy Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Igor123121 05:50, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:33, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki w KrakowieJa, właściciel praw autorskich do tego dzieła, udostępniam je na poniższej licencjiTa fotografia została przesłana w ramach projektu Wiki Lubi Zabytki będącego częścią inicjatywy Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Igor123121 05:50, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:33, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Left valve of a Virgate Tellin, Tellinella virgata var. marginalis --Llez 05:24, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:05, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marilyn Monroe, designed by Pit Ruge, pumpkin festival in the garden of Ludwigsburg Palace, Germany --Llez 05:24, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.
• 
  • Nomination Charlie Chaplin, designed by Pit Ruge, pumpkin festival in the garden of Ludwigsburg Palace, Germany --Llez 05:24, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:46, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gerolstein, monumental area: Denkmalzone Burg Lissingen --Michielverbeek 05:14, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:31, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Müllenborn, catholic church: Filialkirche Sankt Antonius --Michielverbeek 05:14, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:47, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Oos, catholic church: Filialkirche Sankt Rochus --Michielverbeek 05:14, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:31, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Urban at the altar of St. Elizabeth at St. Stephen's parish church in Eggenburg, Lower Austria --Uoaei1 05:13, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 05:37, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Triumphal Arch of Orange (east view) --Uoaei1 04:49, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:17, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Crucifixion of Christ − Fresco at the southern exterior wall of the parish church Zwickenberg, municipality of Oberdrauburg, Carinthia, Austria --Uoaei1 04:49, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 05:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Bartholomew at the winged altar of the Church of the Holy Blood in Pulkau, Lower Austria --Uoaei1 04:49, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:48, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shrine of the altar of St. Elizabeth at St. Stephen's parish church in Eggenburg, Lower Austria. Anonymous master, dated 1521. --Uoaei1 04:49, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:58, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Panixersee (Lag da Pigniu) above Andiast. Waterfall above the reservoir.
    --Famberhorst 04:21, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:51, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Blooming heathland on a heathland in the Groote Zand nature reserve in the Hooghalen Forestry Department.
    --Famberhorst 04:21, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Motor Tanker RIVAGE. ENI 2104768. Location Groote Brekken. Princess Margriet Canal near the lock complex to the IJsselmeer.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:10, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 05:27, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bolsward. Martinikerk (Bolsward). Pipe organ in the Martinikerk.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:10, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:58, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from the gallery in Saint Anthony church in Jesserndorf --Plozessor 04:03, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:52, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Inscription plaque with pediment for Prince-Bishop Julius Echter von Mespelbrunn in the entrance area of the Haßberge District Office in Haßfurt --Plozessor 04:03, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Very good quality. --Gower 04:28, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 1688 hunting boundary stone near Fatschenbrunn --Plozessor 04:03, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ulrich von Hutten memorial in Bettenburg landscape park --Plozessor 04:03, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:25, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination "Murder stone" (stone cross) east of Sylbach --Plozessor 04:03, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:23, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sunset on the beach, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 03:40, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Terragio67 03:52, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ferris wheel at the Kurhaus, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 03:40, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Terragio67 03:52, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grass on the promenade, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 03:40, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:12, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Beach at nightfall, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 03:40, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Harlekin sign of house “Prinzipalmarkt 22” and in the background St Lamberti Church, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:40, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Terragio67 03:53, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hotel Granada, Maracaibo. --Rjcastillo 03:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:45, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Zulia Beer Logo, Maracaibo --Rjcastillo 03:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:45, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Food Carts, Maracaibo. --Rjcastillo 03:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:46, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Bust of Captain Anselmo Belloso, Maracaibo. --Rjcastillo 03:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Could you reduce blue/violet chromatic aberration and fix tilt? --Gower 16:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Entrance to the San José Cemetery, Maracaibo. --Rjcastillo 03:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Union Jack Pub in the former Union Bank, 101 North Loudoun Street, Winchester, Virginia --Acroterion 03:26, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 03:31, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The stairs at the entrance lobby of the Handley Library, Winchester, Virginia --Acroterion 03:26, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support It's a little noisy in the darkest shadows but still good quality. --Syntaxys 03:31, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

October 13, 2025

• 
  • Nomination Saint Alexander Nevsky Church in Petergof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. By User:Pavlikhin --Екатерина Борисова 22:23, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 22:35, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 03:42, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination General view of Grand Peterhof Palace & Grand Cascade of Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. By User:Игорь Гордеев --Екатерина Борисова 22:23, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 22:36, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 03:42, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Triton fountain in Orangery Garden of Lower Park, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. By User:Игорь Гордеев --Екатерина Борисова 22:23, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 22:34, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lion at Voronikhin Colonnades, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. By User:Игорь Гордеев --Екатерина Борисова 22:23, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 22:32, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rose in Private Dacha park, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 22:23, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 22:41, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 16th-century stained glass window of Église Saint-Côme et Saint-Damien d'Hiesville, Manche, France --AFBorchert 21:14, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, but minor CAs in the lower half IMO --Lmbuga 21:18, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Charles Meynier, Ceiling, Louvre, Paris. --Terragio67 21:03, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 21:13, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination La belle Jardinière (1508), Raphael, Louvre, Paris. --Terragio67 21:01, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 21:13, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 03:42, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Avoriaz, pistes de ski. --Terragio67 20:59, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 21:15, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hôtel de ville de Paris, vue du pont Saint Louis, Paris. --Terragio67 20:58, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 21:15, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 03:42, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cardinal Richelieu (Gian Lorenzo Bernini), Louvre, Paris. --Terragio67 20:54, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 22:25, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination South portal of Église Saint-Brice de Beuzeville-au-Plain, Manche, France --AFBorchert 19:26, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 20:40, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination South portal of Église Saint-Brice de Beuzeville-au-Plain, Manche, France --AFBorchert 19:26, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 20:40, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 03:42, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Standing Giraffe at Nairobi National Park, Kenya --Brihaspati 19:16, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Nice, but lacking detail in giraffe texture. --Gower 16:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Partially restored ceiling of a Dev Kulika at the Luna Vasahi Temple, Dilwara, Mt Abu --Brihaspati 19:03, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, but just barely. With the zoom lens used, you should stop down to at least 8 to achieve better sharpness. --Syntaxys 03:42, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Symmetrical ceiling of a deva kulika in the Luna Vasahi Temple, Dilwara, Mt Abu, Rajasthan --Brihaspati 19:03, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 19:27, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Regensteinmühle near Blankenburg in the Harz Mountains --Romzig 17:25, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 19:28, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 03:42, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A fall view over College Hill in Providence, Rhode Island. By User:Filetime --Kzirkel 16:43, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Flickr image, not from a Commoner --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:02, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Debernardi is not a Commoner, but Wikimedian; it is allowed. But imho technically not QI. --Lvova 19:04, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
     Question Why should this be an image by Debernardi? It is from Flickr. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:13, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination #1 most populated city in new mexico I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:. By User:Wars --Kzirkel 16:43, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Oppose Not taken by User:Wars, but transferred from the English Wikipedia. Probably not from a Commoner --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:08, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Debernardi is not a Commoner, but Wikimedian; it is allowed. imho it is borderline, let's discuss. --Lvova 19:04, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
     Comment Opposing vote stricken because Lvova is right. Sorry for the confusion. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:13, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination . By User:Wikipeder --Kzirkel 16:43, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Apparently just a crop from a Flickr image. Probably not photographed by a Commoner. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:01, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The former Union and New Haven Trust Building, located at 205 Church Street in New Haven, ConnecticutI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Kzirkel 16:43, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    The perspective correction does not seem right to me. The building, especially the upper part, appears to be leaning backwards. A suggestion: perhaps this would not occur when editing with Gimp.--Lmbuga 21:07, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Ingalls Ice Rink (Yale Hockey)I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:. By User:Quintinsoloviev --Kzirkel 16:43, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Good composition. --Gower 18:56, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Marsh frog (Pelophylax ridibundus) from Samsun, Turkey. --Ömer selim 16:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination The iron hand crank crane in Hamburg-Ottensen --FlocciNivis 16:21, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Main theme is well presented. --Gower 18:56, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View up to the crown of the over 300 years old Dracaena draco tree, named Drago de San Antonio, in Icod de los Vinos, Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 16:21, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Interesting too. --Gower 18:56, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. es: Es semejante a otra foto que he promovido. Es buenísima. Si no es FP es porque no la entienden. --Lmbuga 23:06, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Canary Island Pine the Mirador de Chirche in Chirche, Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 16:21, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. I like it. --Gower 18:56, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from Drachenfels-Plateau in Königswinter, Germany, to the West on the Rhine and Bonn-Mehlem --FlocciNivis 16:21, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View along a construction site to the building at the Werner-von-Siemens-Platz 1 in Laatzen --FlocciNivis 16:21, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lvova 19:04, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Neoscona oaxacensis, Western Spotted Orb Weaver, Coacalco, Mexico, length 3 cm aproximately: --Cvmontuy 16:12, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Very nice! --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:56, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Surprising --Lmbuga 20:55, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025 Pomnik Grunwaldzki w Krakowie --Igor123121 16:11, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Tilted --Poco a poco 18:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
    Tilted a bit. --Gower 18:56, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025 Kraków, Przekop Talowskiego i wiadukt kolejowy --Igor123121 16:11, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025 Kraków, Kościół św. Idziego w Krakowie --Igor123121 16:11, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose The top crop is a no-go --Poco a poco 18:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025 Kraków, Kościół św. Idziego w Krakowie --Igor123121 16:11, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Crushed blacks (a lot!), big round dust spot on the church's wall. Little blue chromatic aberration. --Gower 18:56, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: MGS5 EV in Echterdingen --Alexander-93 16:01, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Opel Frontera C in Leinfelden --Alexander-93 16:01, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Gussadi Dancers getting prepared for the event --I.Mahesh 15:59, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose foreground person out of focus --George Chernilevsky 05:41, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A kid watching Gussadi dancers getting ready --I.Mahesh 15:59, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 16:01, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A farmer watching the Gussadi dance near Marlawai, Jainoor --I.Mahesh 15:59, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good shot. --PetarM 17:16, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --E bailey 17:19, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Farmers watching their villagers' Gussadi dance at Marlawai, Jainoor --I.Mahesh 15:59, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 16:04, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Village discussions at Marlawai, Jainoor --I.Mahesh 15:59, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support QI --PetarM 17:18, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Nissan Leaf (ZE2) at autoMOBIL Tübingen 2025 --Alexander-93 15:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Renault 4 E-Tech Electric in Echterdingen --Alexander-93 15:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Renault 5 E-Tech Electric in Leinfelden --Alexander-93 15:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Italy, Sicily, Cefalù, Palazzo Vescovile --Berthold Werner 15:46, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 17:53, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Italy, Sicily, Cefalù, Chiesa del Purgatorio --Berthold Werner 15:46, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    There too much purple CAs to me. --Sebring12Hrs 17:52, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Machine gun casemate, blockhouse Allennes-les-Marais--Pierre André Leclercq 14:53, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Not sharp. --Sebring12Hrs 17:51, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Valves in an abandoned factory --Grunpfnul 14:46, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:50, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
    I understand the concept but only the valve taps are in focus. --Gower 18:56, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Good friday procession in Lessines, Belgium --Grunpfnul 14:46, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Interesting, but only one person on the front is close to be in focus, everything else is out of focus. --Gower 18:56, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Analog Photography - City of Ghent, Three Towers --Grunpfnul 14:46, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    The sky is very noisy. --Sebring12Hrs 18:10, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Abandoned Wash Bay of Charbonnage du Hasard de Cheratte --Grunpfnul 14:46, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 18:56, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality and very nice --Lmbuga 22:21, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Concrete water towers in Bailleul, --Pierre André Leclercq 14:50, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Not sharp, overprocessed. --Sebring12Hrs 15:31, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Oratoire A Notre-Dame-de-Walcourt Eppe-Sauvage--Pierre André Leclercq 14:48, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Too soft, blurred. --Sebring12Hrs 15:31, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ochtezeele Chapel Marie-Consolatrice-des-Affligés--Pierre André Leclercq 14:43, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    A bit soft, other opinion ? --Sebring12Hrs 15:29, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Lack of detail. The grass and plants are poorly defined, as are the bricks. --Lmbuga 21:39, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Everes argiades (Pallas, 1771) - Tailed Cupid. By User:Ankit0908 --Atudu 14:13, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry, too sharpened IMO, but that doesn't matter to me. What I find important is that the composition, for a butterfly to be the subject, is very poor: a large part of the right side of the photo is terribly out of focus and should not be in the photo as it is very distracting and prevents the viewer from focusing on the subject. It's not IQ for me. --Lmbuga 21:51, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lethe scanda (Moore, 1858) - Blue Forester. By User:Atanu Bose Photography --Atudu 13:51, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Head and abdomen are out of focus, but maybe it is enough? Good anyway. --Gower 18:56, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lethe serbonis ( Hewitson,1876) - Brown Forester. By User:Atanu Bose Photography --Atudu 13:51, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Romzig 17:25, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Opened wing basking position of Heliophorus moorei (Hewitson, 1865) Azure Sapphire. By User:B Savit --Atudu 13:51, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Opened wing basking position of Lethe atkinsonia (Hewitson, 1876) - Small Goldenfork. By User:B Savit --Atudu 13:51, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Balja Greda / Durmitor National Park --Imehling 13:27, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:50, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bay of Kotor at Bijela / Montenegro --Imehling 13:27, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Obviously a panorama with one completeley unsharp frame in the center --Uoaei1 04:57, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bay of Kotor from Kamenari ferry --Imehling 13:27, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 13:39, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Žugića Monument / Durmitor National Park --Imehling 13:27, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Very good quality. --George Chernilevsky 13:38, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stećak (medieval tombstone) in Žugića Graveyard / Durmitor National Park --Imehling 13:27, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 13:38, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Witte Anna ("White Anne") in The Hague --ReneeWrites 12:34, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
    Unfortunately, it's a little blurry; apparently, the AF didn't want anything to do with Anne ;-) --Syntaxys 12:54, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
    Unfortunately you're right, this doesn't meet the bar for QI. Thanks for this and the other reviews! ReneeWrites 13:04, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Malietoren in The Hague --ReneeWrites 12:34, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 12:54, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination New Babylon in The Hague --ReneeWrites 12:34, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 12:54, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Palace of Justice in The Hague --ReneeWrites 12:34, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 12:54, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Saint Catherine's Church in Hoogstraten --ReneeWrites 12:34, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Church of St. Nicholas in Radochów 1 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 12:21, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:32, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality, well exposed. --Gower 12:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of St. Nicholas in Radochów 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 12:21, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:32, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality, well exposed. --Gower 12:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rectory in Radochów 1 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 12:21, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:33, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality, well exposed. --Gower 12:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rectory in Radochów 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 12:21, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:33, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality, well exposed. --Gower 12:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rectory in Radochów 3 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 12:21, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:34, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality, well exposed. --Gower 12:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Escudo de armas na fachada de Acibechería. Catedral de Santiago de Compostela. --Lmbuga 12:09, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:31, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lilac-breasted roller (Coracias caudata), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 11:04, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:00, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Plains zebra (Equus quagga), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 11:04, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:00, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Plains zebra (Equus quagga), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 11:04, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:00, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Plains zebra (Equus quagga), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 11:04, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:01, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:02, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Vervet monkey (Chlorocebus pygerythrus), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 11:04, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    How about darkening the backgroud a bit? --Gower 12:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Cyan CAs on the tail below the branch. Also on the top left. Grey halo on the branches to the left of the monkey.--Lmbuga 16:48, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
    I've cropped it and got rid of some benches, but I haven't seen any CA --Poco a poco 18:40, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
    I have left two notes on the image to mark where they are clearer. I find it surprising that you cannot see them.--Lmbuga 20:44, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
    Now, also, spots to the left of the monkey --Lmbuga 20:48, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
    Thank you for the notes. I removed it. Quite frankly that feedback belongs in the pixelpeeing category in my eyes. --Poco a poco 19:04, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fishing boat with the Vasco da Gama Bridge in the background, Parque Urbano do Tejo e do Trancão, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 10:36, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, but I would prefer a bottom crop --Michielverbeek 11:27, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
    I understand, I was also on the fence regarding the crop. At the end I chose this one to keep the symmetry of the reflection and the contrast between the cool colours of the water and the warm tones of the slit --Julesvernex2 13:30, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination '"As Três Graças" 1973 marble sculpture by Fernando Fernandes, Jardim Irmã Lúcia, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 10:36, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:02, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Waxing Gibbous Moon, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 10:36, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Sharp enough :) --Gower 12:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Yeah, I shot this on a Hanimex (Tokina?) 400mm from the 70/80s. It works okay on lower resolution digital sensors like this one, but breaks apart with higher resolution ones (PS: noted a hint of chromatic aberration, will correct it tonight) --Julesvernex2 13:30, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
    Thank you --Lmbuga 23:19, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Façade detail, Museu de Arte, Arquitetura e Tecnologia, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 10:36, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Nice --Lmbuga 12:02, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Façade detail, Museu de Arte, Arquitetura e Tecnologia, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 10:36, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Nice --Lmbuga 12:04, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Carved doors in Said Mahruyjan Complex in Khiva, Uzbekistan --PetarM 10:07, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:06, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Audi S1 in Frankfurt-Ostend --MB-one 10:06, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:08, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Several official service boats moored on a quay in Stralsund --MB-one 10:06, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: View of a Quicksilver boat at Interboot 2020, Friedrichshafen --MB-one 10:06, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Driver's compartment of a Mercedes-Benz CL 65 AMG (type C 216) --MB-one 10:06, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 12:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Scania (Johanna Salomonsson Lind, left) receiving the Busworld Label of Excellence in Driveline Technology Coach for the Scania Irizar i6S Efficient PHEV from Inge Buytaert at Busworld Europe 2025 --MB-one 10:06, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Wood of black mangrove - Bois de Palétuvier noir --Ercé 09:36, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 09:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A group of young Mica Caps (Coprinellus micaceus) in the mixed forest near Rheinzabern; height approx. 8-10 cm --Syntaxys 09:34, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. But please add a category for the location. --XRay 09:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The common Porcini mushroom (Boletus edulis) accompanied by an Amethyst Deceiver (Laccaria amethystina); mushroom height and diameter of the cap of the B. edulis approx. 20 cm, location: mixed forest near Rheinzabern --Syntaxys 09:34, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 09:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination fruits of Grandidier's baobab - Fruits de Baobab de Grandidier --Ercé 09:32, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 09:58, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination There was a temple here --Lvova 09:30, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 09:33, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Baltic rail terminal --Lvova 09:30, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:16, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Pedestrian zone in Thessaloniki. I prefer not to crop to show this empty sunny area. --Lvova 09:30, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: A piece of a factory railway --Lvova 09:30, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Good picture, but a bit underexposed IMO --Lmbuga 09:40, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Svyazi Street (Lomonosov) --Lvova 09:30, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. I prefer different composition, but it's OK. --Gower 12:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sculpture with coat of arms on the Obradoiro façade, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 09:29, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lvova 09:46, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sculpture on the Obradoiro façade, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 09:29, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lvova 09:46, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination ‘Free Palestine.’ Entrance to Alameda Park in Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). October 2025. --Lmbuga 09:29, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:16, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Galleries in O Toural square, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 09:29, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:02, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Terracotta panels of the Lakkhi Janardan Temple in Ghurisha, Birbhum, West Bengal. --Sumitsurai 09:05, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Terracotta panels of the Lakkhi Janardan Temple in Ghurisha, Birbhum, West Bengal. --Sumitsurai 09:05, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Terracotta panels of the Lakkhi Janardan Temple in Ghurisha, Birbhum, West Bengal. --Sumitsurai 09:05, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:16, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Terracotta panels of the Lakkhi Janardan Temple in Ghurisha, Birbhum, West Bengal. --Sumitsurai 09:05, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Hamlet of Prapic (Hautes-Alpes, France)--Pline 09:02, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:21, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shepherd's hut overlooking the Drac Noir valley near Prapic (Hautes-Alpes, France)--Pline 09:02, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:21, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 09:27, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Path leading from the hamlet of Prapic to the Saut du Laire along the Drac Noir (Hautes-Alpes, France) --Pline 09:02, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:21, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Improvements on the path leading from Prapic to the Saut du Laire (Hautes-Alpes, France) --Pline 09:02, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:21, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination he Drac noir torrent upstream from Papric (Hautes-Alpes, France) --Pline 09:02, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. ça faisait longtemps. --Sebring12Hrs 09:21, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 09:27, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Panorama of Nainital captured by a drone, Uttarakhand, India. By User:Harshit SR --UnpetitproleX 08:42, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry, oversaturated, artifacts. --Lmbuga 09:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bytom, Rozbark coal mine, Bończyk engine house before restoration. --Gower 07:20, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 07:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Florian Lesik, honorary citizen of Chorzów --Gower 07:20, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 07:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 18th-century façade of the pipe organ of Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Verdun, France --AFBorchert 07:37, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good, impressive quality. --Gower 07:48, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 18th-century façade of the pipe organ of Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Verdun, France --AFBorchert 07:37, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good, impressive quality. Very detailed. --Gower 07:48, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gallicrex cinerea in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 07:02, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Sharp enough. --Gower 07:48, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gallicrex cinerea in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 07:02, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Sharp enough. --Gower 07:48, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gallicrex cinerea in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 07:02, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Well balanced composition. --Gower 07:48, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Gallicrex cinerea in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 07:02, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Nice, but bright and low areas partially clipped. Could you fix it? --Gower 07:48, 13 October 2025 (UTC)@Gower: I have tried to fix it and uploaded a new version, thank you. -- Tisha Mukherjee 06:22, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Amandava amandava (Red Avadavat) in Baruipur, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 07:02, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Very good quality. Creamy bokeh. --Gower 07:48, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Railways, Kleine Molenstraat, in Lauwe, Belgium --Velvet 06:53, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:25, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fountain lion statue --Romainbehar 06:36, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 07:15, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 07:21, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Allegory of Summer statue --Romainbehar 06:36, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:52, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Gower 07:15, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Zajezdnia tramwaju normalnotorowego, ul. św. Wawrzyńca 12, 13, 17 --Igor123121 06:31, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Generally OK, but highlights are clipped. How about half filter or highlight compression in postprocessing? --Gower 07:15, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Gower:  Done? --Igor123121 07:23, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
    Undoubtely better, but could you fix purple fringing also? It's visible around cables on sky. Maybe try even more reduction of highlights in the sky. --Gower 07:53, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Gower: I did what I could, I hope it's enough :) --Igor123121 09:27, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025, Kraków, Zajezdnia tramwaju normalnotorowego, ul. św. Wawrzyńca 12, 13, 17 --Igor123121 06:31, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:52, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025 ,Kraków, Hotel Cracovia.jpg --Igor123121 06:31, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    The photo is generally ok. I know Krakow is crowded, but I would prefer fewer cars here. --Gower 07:15, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Gower: I understand, I’m aware of that; however, the photo documents a driveway that is listed as a historic monument. I’d also prefer if there were fewer cars, but there’s nothing I can do about it :( --Igor123121 07:23, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality anyway ;) Maybe someday the cars will be parked in another place. --Gower 07:53, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025, Przemyśl, Gmach banku Polskiej Kasy Oszczędności --Igor123121 06:31, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. I would prefer a bit more bottom, but it is acceptable --Gower 07:15, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025, Kraków, Karmelicka 5 --Igor123121 06:31, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. The best photo of that building so far on Commons. --Gower 07:15, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kenmore Air De Havilland Canada DHC-3T Otter N76KA on inbound taxi at Victoria Harbor, BC Canada --GRDN711 06:31, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. And add location category, please --Mike1979 Russia 06:52, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Done Thanks for the review. --GRDN711 16:45, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Oppersdorfe's palace in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie 1 --Jacek Halicki 06:20, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:52, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Oppersdorfe's palace in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie 2 --Jacek Halicki 06:20, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:22, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Oppersdorfe's palace in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie 3 --Jacek Halicki 06:20, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Delete disturbing branches from the sky in upper right corner, please --Mike1979 Russia 06:55, 13 October 2025 (UTC)@Mike1979 Russia:  Done--Jacek Halicki 07:21, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 08:40, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Linen Industry Plant "Lech" 1 --Jacek Halicki 06:20, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:52, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Linen Industry Plant "Lech" 2 --Jacek Halicki 06:20, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:53, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Red-legged furrow bee (Halictus rubicundus) --Ermell 05:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Benjism89 05:55, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Red-legged furrow bee (Halictus rubicundus) --Ermell 05:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:23, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Red-legged furrow bee (Halictus rubicundus) --Ermell 05:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:23, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Red-legged furrow bee (Halictus rubicundus) --Ermell 05:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Benjism89 05:55, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Red-legged furrow bee (Halictus rubicundus) --Ermell 05:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:23, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chassagne-Montrachet (Côte-d'Or, France) - Vineyard with the village in the background --Benjism89 05:45, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:52, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chassagne-Montrachet (Côte-d'Or, France) - Vineyard, with the village in the background, and a sign mentioning the Criots-Bâtard-Montrachet Grand Cru vineyard in the foreground --Benjism89 05:45, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:52, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chassagne-Montrachet (Côte-d'Or, France) - Europe square --Benjism89 05:45, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:52, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chassagne-Montrachet (Côte-d'Or, France) - Direction signs in the village, mainly mentioning vineyards --Benjism89 05:45, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:52, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chassagne-Montrachet (Côte-d'Or, France) - School, town hall and war memorial --Benjism89 05:45, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:52, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kazan Railway Station --Mike1979 Russia 05:39, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:25, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kazan Railway Station --Mike1979 Russia 05:39, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:52, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kazan Railway Station --Mike1979 Russia 05:39, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:25, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kazan Checkmaryov — Kamenev House --Mike1979 Russia 05:39, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:43, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kazan Azimov Mosque --Mike1979 Russia 05:39, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose The minaret is distorted and blurry at the top, the bottom crop is too tight and the light conditions are not good. Sorry. --Екатерина Борисова 22:37, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Left valve of a Sunrise Tellin, Tellina radiata var. unimaculata --Llez 05:19, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:54, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Charlie Chaplin, designed by Pit Ruge, pumpkin festival in the garden of Ludwigsburg Palace, Germany --Llez 05:19, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    A little blue CAs, otherwise good --Benjism89 06:04, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Done --Llez 10:33, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Benjism89 18:30, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Charlie Chaplin, designed by Pit Ruge, pumpkin festival in the garden of Ludwigsburg Palace, Germany --Llez 05:19, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:21, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Pelm in Germany-RP, catholic church: Filialkirche Sankt Willibrord --Michielverbeek 05:19, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination near Pelm in Germany-RP, castle: Burg Kasselburg --Michielverbeek 05:19, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination near Pelm in Germany-RP, castle: Burg Kasselburg --Michielverbeek 05:19, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:56, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clouds over the Mountainsides of Breil-Brigels (Graubünden).
    --Famberhorst 04:22, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:27, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bust of Paul Harry, Maracaibo. --Rjcastillo 04:14, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:23, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mosaic mural of the Virgin of Chiquinquirá. --Rjcastillo 04:14, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Entrada Parque Ana María Campos, Maracaibo. --Rjcastillo 04:14, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mural in Maracaibo --Rjcastillo 04:14, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:30, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Brushing Cart (Scraping). --Rjcastillo 04:14, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Drents-Friese Wold National Park. Trees reflect in a heathland pond.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:09, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:19, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Motor tanker INTRUDER. ENI 04801160. Location Groote Brekken. Princess Margriet Canal near the lock complex to the IJsselmeer.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:09, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:19, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Groyne at Dovetief, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:09, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Is there a focus? You play with art effects, so I would prefer to ask... --Lvova 18:56, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Damenpfad, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:09, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:13, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Trees shaped by the wind at Zuckerpad in the Lower Saxony Wadden Sea National Park (buffer zone), Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:09, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:10, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dune landscape with signpost to the wreck at the eastern end in the Lower Saxony Wadden Sea National Park (quiet zone), Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:09, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Foundation of the sea fortress (former Battery East) in the “Lower Saxony Wadden Sea” National Park (quiet zone), Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:09, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:25, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Celosia argentea in the Philippines --TheNuggeteer 03:41, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose For this kind of photo IMO too unsharp and too much noise. --XRay 04:30, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stations of the Cross in Saint Anthony church in Jesserndorf --Plozessor 03:17, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:19, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination War memorial in Saint Anthony church in Jesserndorf --Plozessor 03:17, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:19, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Weißenbrunn cross stone, “Leichstein” (“corpse stone”), ‘Blutbannstein’ (“blood ban stone”), on the road between Weißenbrunn and Gemünd --Plozessor 03:17, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:28, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stained-glass windows in Saint Mary church in Königsberg in Bayern --Plozessor 03:17, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:28, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Relief at Saint Mary church in Königsberg in Bayern --Plozessor 03:17, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:28, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

October 12, 2025

• 
  • Nomination Marly Palace in Lower Park of Peterhof, Saint Petersburg. By User:Игорь Гордеев --Екатерина Борисова 21:43, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --ROCKY 04:11, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:10, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Giant's Head, Sergiyevka Park, Saint Petersburg. By User:The Cosmonaut --Екатерина Борисова 21:43, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --ROCKY 04:11, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination the Imperial Academy of Arts building; Saint Petersburg. By User:The Cosmonaut --Екатерина Борисова 21:43, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --ROCKY 04:11, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Spire of the Esders and Scheefhals building, Saint Petersburg. By User:The Cosmonaut --Екатерина Борисова 21:43, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --ROCKY 04:09, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rose in Private Dacha park, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 21:43, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:16, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Witte Anna tower in The Hague --ReneeWrites 21:22, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 21:24, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tram stop Ternoot in The Hague --ReneeWrites 21:22, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:37, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Monarch Complex and CAK in The Hague --ReneeWrites 21:22, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:31, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tower of the Palace of Justice in The Hague --ReneeWrites 21:22, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:17, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Malietoren in The Hague --ReneeWrites 21:22, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 21:24, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:10, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Blue-winged Teal (Spatula discors), female, at the Gros-Cacouna Marsh Ornithological Site, Cacouna, Bas-Saint-Laurent, Quebec, Canada. --IrksomeBuccaneer2635 19:56, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, although a but on the noisy side --MB-one 10:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lesser Yellowlegs (Tringa flavipes) at the Gros-Cacouna Marsh Ornithological Site, Cacouna, Bas-Saint-Laurent, Quebec, Canada. --IrksomeBuccaneer2635 19:56, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    imho water is full of color noise, also it is focused on the bird's tail, not its head --Lvova 09:52, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Water is noisy and bird is too bright. --Gower 16:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination American red squirrel (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus) on a rock at the Gros-Cacouna Marsh Ornithological Site, Cacouna, Bas-Saint-Laurent, Quebec, Canada. --IrksomeBuccaneer2635 19:56, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 21:23, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stalls in the eastern choir from 1760 of Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Verdun --AFBorchert 19:26, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 21:21, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Touring Club Suisse ambulance van at Geneva International Motor Show 2024 --MB-one 19:11, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 21:23, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Front of a John Deere 9RX at Agritechnica 2023 --MB-one 19:11, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lvova 09:53, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination PTS-M amphibious vehicle at Pfingsttreffen Pütnitz 2018 in Ribnitz-Damgarten --MB-one 19:11, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 19:54, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: EURO 2024 Festival in Frankfurt am Main --MB-one 19:11, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Tepe Nautilus Mall in Istanbul --MB-one 19:11, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:40, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Terracotta Panels --Sumitsurai 18:07, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:19, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Siuri Damodar Temple Terracotta --Sumitsurai 18:07, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Siuri Damodar Temple Terracotta --Sumitsurai 18:07, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Nice picture but unfortunately tilted. Could you please fix this? --AFBorchert 19:29, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
    @AFBorchert: , have corrected the tilt. Could you please check now? Thanks. --Sumitsurai 09:59, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Thanks for fixing. Good quality. --AFBorchert 17:06, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Terracotta panels of the Lakkhi Janardan Temple in Ghurisha, Birbhum, West Bengal --Sumitsurai 18:07, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Terracotta panels of the Lakkhi Janardan Temple in Ghurisha, Birbhum, West Bengal --Sumitsurai 18:07, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: MG ZS (crossover, second generation) at Automesse Ludwigsburg 2025 --Alexander-93 17:28, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Mazda6e at Automesse Ludwigsburg 2025 --Alexander-93 17:28, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:34, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Barbara church interior, Berschdorf organ --Gower 17:07, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 19:25, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jerzy Jenkner glass ashtray--Gower 17:07, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 19:25, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Holy Family church in Bytom-Bobrek, Poland, stained glass window depicting crucifixion of Christ--Gower 17:07, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 19:25, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aloysia Wiedner gravestone (fragment of tombstone unearthed) in Upper Silesian Museum--Gower 17:07, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 19:25, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Holy Family church in Bytom-Bobrek, Poland, aisle--Gower 17:07, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:25, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Historic Pagoda Style Architecture in Kathmandu Durbar Square--Bijay Chaurasia 16:46, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 17:09, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A manhole cover on Baltic rail terminal --Lvova 16:38, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 17:09, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A manhole cover in Lomonosov --Lvova 16:38, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 17:09, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: A platform on the Oranienbaum I station --Lvova 16:38, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: On a fish market in Thessaloniki --Lvova 16:38, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination A manhole cover on the Baltic rail terminal --Lvova 16:38, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 16:55, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kalyan Minaret, Bukhara, Uzbekistan --PetarM 16:37, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Impressive. --Gower 16:55, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Italy, Sicily, Cefalù, left tower of the cathedral with palm tree --Berthold Werner 16:25, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Nice set. --Gower 16:55, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Škoda Epiq Showcar at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 16:15, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Dark areas, especially the shadow under the car, are noisy. --Lvova 09:51, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Opel Grandland B at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 16:15, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lvova 09:51, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Omoda 7 SHS at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 16:15, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lvova 09:51, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 1979 Nissan LD28 engine --TTTNIS 14:57, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: 1991 Nissan CD20 engine --TTTNIS 14:57, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: 2010 Nissan YD25DDTi engine --TTTNIS 14:57, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination 1989 Nissan VG30DETT engine --TTTNIS 14:57, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nissan X-Trail T32 hybrid powertrain --TTTNIS 14:57, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, not perfect but favorable. --Gower 17:09, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025, Kraków, Park Strzelecki w Krakowie --Igor123121 13:48, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    The previous version had 3,376 x 6000 pixels --Lmbuga 14:28, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Lmbuga:  Done --Igor123121 14:53, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 15:06, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Escudo de armas na fachada de Acibechería. Catedral de Santiago de Compostela. --Lmbuga 13:25, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 14:46, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Plaque commemorating the fifth centenary of the University of Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). Monastery of San Paio de Antealtares. --Lmbuga 13:25, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 13:34, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Relief on the façade of the Pazo de Fonseca. Santiago de Compostela. Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 13:25, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Detailed --Gower 15:01, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Portal of the Colexio de San Xerónimo de Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 13:25, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 14:28, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Portal of the Colexio de San Xerónimo de Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 13:25, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 13:41, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:10, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Spa gardens in Lądek-Zdrój by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 13:24, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 14:26, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wojciech Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój 1 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 13:24, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 13:58, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 14:25, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wojciech Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 13:24, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 14:25, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wojciech Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój 3 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 13:24, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 14:25, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wojciech Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój 4 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 13:24, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support good quality. —Brihaspati 13:30, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View through an alley to the tower of the parish church St. Jakobus in Werfen --FlocciNivis 12:55, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 15:17, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View along the Calle el Barranco to the street tunnel, which leads though a solidified lava flow, in Icod de los Vinos --FlocciNivis 12:55, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, but seems too bright a bit. --Gower 16:55, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View along a path that leads downhill on the Otto-Wagner-Areal in Vienna, Austria --FlocciNivis 12:55, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 19:32, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The war memorial on the Obermenzing cemetery by Karl Himmelstoß and Karl Hilbinger --FlocciNivis 12:55, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 13:45, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View across the Humboldthafen to the Campus Charité Mitte --FlocciNivis 12:55, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 13:43, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Safi Port --User:Mounir Neddi 13:23, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Not sharp, low level of details. Sorry. --Екатерина Борисова 14:51, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination D. José statue during the COVID-19 lockdown, Praça do Comércio, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 12:01, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 13:40, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination D. José statue during the COVID-19 lockdown, Praça do Comércio, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 12:01, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 13:40, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:10, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Empty Praça do Comércio during the COVID-19 lockdown, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 12:01, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 13:29, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Empty Praça do Comércio during the COVID-19 lockdown, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 12:01, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 13:25, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Empty Arco da Rua Augusta during the COVID-19 lockdown, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 12:01, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 12:03, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 14th-century window with panels from c. 1500 in the southern ambulatory of Cathédrale Notre-Dame d'Évreux --AFBorchert 11:50, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 13:58, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Details of a 14th-century window with panels from c. 1500 in the southern ambulatory of Cathédrale Notre-Dame d'Évreux --AFBorchert 11:50, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 13:58, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rosary chapel in the northern ambulatory of Cathédrale Notre-Dame d'Évreux --AFBorchert 11:50, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Very good quality. --Gower 16:55, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:10, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 13th-century window in the south aisle of Cathédrale Notre-Dame d'Évreux --AFBorchert 11:50, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 13:58, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination White-backed vulture (Gyps africanus), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 11:34, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. (little chromatic aberration on beak, but overall fine) --Gower 16:55, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lilac-breasted roller (Coracias caudata), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 11:33, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Lovely fellow, nicely taken. Good quality. --AFBorchert 11:51, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:10, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lilac-breasted roller (Coracias caudata), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 11:33, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 14:49, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lilac-breasted roller (Coracias caudata), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 11:33, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 14:49, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lilac-breasted roller (Coracias caudata), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 11:33, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 11:52, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Scuplture of Yakshini at Chaumukhjini Pol, Ahmedabad, Gujarat --Brihaspati 11:23, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 11:53, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sculptures on the pillar of the Ajitnath Jain Temple, Ahmedabad, Gujarat --Brihaspati 11:16, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:36, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The idol of Sambhavnatha, third tirthankara, at Sambhavnathni Khadki, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India --Brihaspati 10:21, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:36, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Residential house, Suzdal --Vsatinet 09:44, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    The house appears to be tilted, please fix this. --AFBorchert 11:54, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Domes of Cathedral of the Protection of the Theotokos at Pokrovsky Monastery, Suzdal --Vsatinet 09:44, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 11:55, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ascension Church, Suzdal --Vsatinet 09:44, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Rione Colonna 09:47, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Walls of Spaso-Yevfimiyev Monastery, Suzdal --Vsatinet 09:44, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 09:48, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:10, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Lauwe train station, Belgium --Velvet 08:52, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality; P.S. I would choose 16:9 to get the building more present. --2015 Michael 2015 09:12, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pavo cristatus (Indian Peafowl) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:22, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Lacks sharpness, sorry --Poco a poco 11:37, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pavo cristatus (Indian Peafowl) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:22, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Nice but not very detailed. --Gower 17:17, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Amandava amandava (Red Avadavat) in Baruipur, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:22, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Rione Colonna 09:49, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Amandava amandava (Red Avadavat) in Baruipur, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:22, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    @Tisha Your 3 nice bird pics: You have privided uploads with very less pixels, why? --2015 Michael 2015 09:12, 12 October 2025 (UTC)@2015 Michael 2015: That much is left after cropping the image to desired frame. It's a very small bird and we always don't get the opportunity get enough close so cropping is the only option. -- Tisha Mukherjee 07:10, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Amandava amandava (Red Avadavat) in Baruipur, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:22, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:37, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025, Kraków, Park Strzelecki w Krakowie --Igor123121 08:03, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Rione Colonna 09:50, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Park Strzelecki w Krakowie --Igor123121 08:03, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Nice, but try reduce blue chromatic aberration (no offence) --Gower 16:55, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025, Kraków, Park Strzelecki w Krakowie --Igor123121 08:03, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 14:50, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025, Kraków, Park Strzelecki w Krakowie --Igor123121 08:03, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 14:50, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Park Strzelecki w Krakowie --Igor123121 08:03, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Poor categorization, tilted (look at the background) --Poco a poco 11:39, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Mary chapel "Na Pustkowiu" in Lądek-Zdrój 1 --Jacek Halicki 07:56, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:57, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Mary chapel "Na Pustkowiu" in Lądek-Zdrój 2 --Jacek Halicki 07:56, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:59, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Mary chapel "Na Pustkowiu" in Lądek-Zdrój 3 --Jacek Halicki 07:56, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Tilted --Poco a poco 11:38, 12 October 2025 (UTC)@Poco a poco:  Done--Jacek Halicki 19:08, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:30, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Mary chapel "Na Pustkowiu" in Lądek-Zdrój 4 --Jacek Halicki 07:56, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Rione Colonna 09:50, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Spa gardens in Lądek-Zdrój --Jacek Halicki 07:56, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:38, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Moscow. Novodevichy Park. View of Moscow-City --Alexxx1979 07:54, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Fine composition. --Gower 17:17, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fountain in the Park of Versailles --Romainbehar 07:03, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lvova 19:12, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statues of Neptune and Amphitrite --Romainbehar 07:03, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Your Fujifilm X-H1 takes good photos in your hands, better than your Pixel smarthphone ;) --Sebring12Hrs 10:41, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sviyazhsk St Nicholas Church --Mike1979 Russia 06:57, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Rione Colonna 09:50, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sviyazhsk Dormition of the Theotokos Church --Mike1979 Russia 06:57, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 07:01, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sviyazhsk Dormition of the Theotokos Church --Mike1979 Russia 06:57, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:15, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:10, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sviyazhsk Saint Sergius Church --Mike1979 Russia 06:57, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kazan KRIB Water Intake --Mike1979 Russia 06:57, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good qua;ity --Michielverbeek 08:07, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Puligny-Montrachet (Côte-d'Or, France) - Horse-Chestnut square --Benjism89 06:45, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:59, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Puligny-Montrachet (Côte-d'Or, France) - Town hall --Benjism89 06:45, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:59, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Puligny-Montrachet (Côte-d'Or, France) - Vineyard along the road to Chassagne-Montrachet --Benjism89 06:45, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:59, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Puligny-Montrachet (Côte-d'Or, France) - Vineyard with the village in the background --Benjism89 06:45, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:59, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chassagne-Montrachet (Côte-d'Or, France) - Château of Chassagne-Montrachet, with vines in the foreground --Benjism89 06:45, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 07:01, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wayside shrine (Christian and Hindu), Forest Gate, Ooty, The Nilgiris, India --Tagooty 06:42, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. (It is really wayside shrine? Not three pictures on the ground?) --Gower 17:17, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View to NE below Marlimund Road, Forest Gate, Ooty, The Nilgiris --Tagooty 06:42, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Rione Colonna 09:50, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Orange fungus on the north side of a eucalyptus tree, Ooty, India --Tagooty 06:42, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:58, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Former US special ammunition depot, Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 06:05, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 06:45, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of the sky from Nordstrand, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 06:05, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ferris wheel at the Kurhaus, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 06:05, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. OK. --Gower 17:17, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Structure in the sand, beach, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 06:05, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination The architectural and symbolic feature at Konark Sun Temple, Puri, Odisha --Gnoeee 05:48, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Blurry --Tagooty 06:45, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Right valve of a Sunrise Tellin, Tellina radiata var. unimaculata --Llez 05:37, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 05:45, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mickey Mouse, designed by Pit Ruge, pumpkin festival in the garden of Ludwigsburg Palace, Ludwigsburg, Germany --Llez 05:37, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:37, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Makeup artist material, designed by Pit Ruge, pumpkin festival in the garden of Ludwigsburg Palace, Germany --Llez 05:37, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:45, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Daun in Germany-RP, the reformed church --Michielverbeek 05:15, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Nice but tilted --Gower 05:45, 12 October 2025 (UTC) Thanks, I  Done a small perspective correction, the verticals are straight now --Michielverbeek 07:57, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dockweiler in Germany-RP, catholic church: Pfarrkirche Sankt Laurentius --Michielverbeek 05:15, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:45, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hohenfels in Germany-RP, catholic church: Kirche Sankt Silvester --Michielverbeek 05:15, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bijay Chaurasia 05:26, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rockeskyll in Germany-RP, catholic church: Pfarrkirche Sankt Bartholomäus --Michielverbeek 05:15, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Rione Colonna 09:51, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ceiling in the parish church in Fulda --Ermell 04:34, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bijay Chaurasia 05:27, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pulpit in Fulda Cathedral --Ermell 04:34, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 05:39, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clouds over the Mountainsides of Breil-Brigels (Graubünden).
    --Famberhorst 04:20, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Rione Colonna 09:51, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aekingerzand Drents-Friese Wold National Park. Dead uprooted Scots pine next to the path.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:09, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 05:39, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Juice cart, Maracaibo. --Rjcastillo 02:26, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 05:45, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

October 11, 2025

• 
  • Nomination Pinus sylvestris in Galder --ReneeWrites 23:51, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 06:46, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Memorial at the Polish military cemetery Breda --ReneeWrites 23:51, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 06:46, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint John the Baptist chapel in Illins, Isere, France. --Tournasol7 23:43, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 05:40, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Partial view of Nova Friburgo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. --Vitorperrut555 23:02, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Nice, but tilted, can you fix it? --Gower 16:55, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Entrada de Nova Friburgo Country Club, localizado em Nova FriburgoEu, titular dos direitos autorais desta obra, publico-a nos termos da seguinte licença: --Vitorperrut555 23:02, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Detail is low and seems overprocessed --FlocciNivis 14:52, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Siuri Damodar Temple Terracotta Panels. --RajashreeTalukdar 21:39, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:15, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Siuri Damodar Temple Terracotta Panel. --RajashreeTalukdar 21:39, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:15, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Terracotta panel - Damodar Temple - Siuri. --RajashreeTalukdar 21:39, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:15, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Chata Cyborga in Bielice 1 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 18:34, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    chromatic aberration to fix, color aberrations (red branches in front of black parts of building) --Gower 19:57, 11 October 2025 (UTC)@Gower:  Done--Jacek Halicki 12:34, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Chata Cyborga in Bielice 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 18:34, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    chromatic aberration to fix, color aberrations on trees (color noise?) --Gower 19:57, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chata Cyborga in Bielice 3 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 18:34, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    chromatic aberration to fix, color aberrations on trees (color noise?) --Gower 19:57, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
    This one is ok isn't it ? --Sebring12Hrs 21:47, 11 October 2025 (UTC)@Gower:  Done--Jacek Halicki 12:39, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 20:43, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Chata Cyborga in Bielice 4 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 18:34, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    chromatic aberration to fix, color aberrations on trees (color noise?) --Gower 19:57, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Albrechtshalle in Lądek-Zdrój by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 18:34, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    chromatic aberration to fix --Gower 19:57, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lądek Zdrój w 2025Ja, właściciel praw autorskich do tego dzieła, udostępniam je na poniższej licencji --KrzysztofPoplawski 16:49, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    CA visible especially on roof. --Gower 17:26, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
    CA fixed --KrzysztofPoplawski 13:24, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. Nice compostion --Gower 19:46, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Zespół Skankan na Ostróda Reggae Festival w 2025Ja, właściciel praw autorskich do tego dzieła, udostępniam je na poniższej licencji --KrzysztofPoplawski 16:49, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Clipped in bright areas (too bright) --Gower 17:26, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
    bright regions on the skin - fixed --KrzysztofPoplawski 13:56, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
    I am not convinced. Red chromatic aberration and that cropped guy aren't good. --Gower 16:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Himalayan tahr in Sagarmatha National Park. By User:Gurung pratap --UnpetitproleX 16:47, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    the details seem blurred partially, it it a question of post-processing? --Gower 17:18, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
    I realise there were other issues as well, such as WM, will renominate a fixed version shortly. UnpetitproleX 17:46, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Gower:  Done. Please check now. --UnpetitproleX 17:59, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
    Nothing changed, it's the same file. --Gower 20:17, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
    Please compare carefully, this (nom) and this (prev) are definitely not the same file (see for instance the head position, the watermark in bottom left, the difference in resolution etc.) UnpetitproleX 00:33, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
    yes, it's a different picture, and you uploaded it after my previous comment. --Gower 18:17, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ipatiev Monastery, Kostroma --Vsatinet 16:43, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lvova 09:49, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Gate Church of the Annunciation at Spaso-Yevfimiyev Monastery, Suzdal --Vsatinet 16:43, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review Good quality, but please remove the wooden roof in the left corner --Michielverbeek 08:11, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
     Comment I think this part of roof is quite appropriate in the frame. Let's wait for other opinions. --Vsatinet 11:12, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Refectory, Knyaginin Monastery, Vladimir --Vsatinet 16:43, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 17:17, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki --Igor123121 15:45, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Slight barrel distortion. --Gower 17:18, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Gower:  Done --Igor123121 18:46, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
    Tilt increased and resolution decreased… --Gower 20:17, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Gower: The resolution is the same, I don’t understand your criticism. As for nitpicking every little detail - does the photo really look bad? Is the perspective that bad? I don’t know how I could improve it any further. --Igor123121 20:39, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki --Igor123121 15:45, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Too bright, bright areas clipped --Gower 17:18, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Gower:  Done --Igor123121 18:46, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
    why resolution declined from 4000 × 6000 to 2088 × 2600? --Gower 20:00, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Gower: Because in my opinion, the photo looks better at that resolution. --Igor123121 20:37, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki --Igor123121 15:45, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Left gravestone strongly burned out (clipped) --Gower 17:18, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Gower:  Done --Igor123121 18:46, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
    It's the same picture with clipped areas but cropped. Grave is also partially clipped. --Gower 20:00, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Gower: The photo focuses on the grave of Otto Hodak, which is not cropped. As for Professor Filipiak’s overexposed tomb, I did as much as I could. --Igor123121 20:37, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki --Igor123121 15:45, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Huge clipping on sky --Gower 17:18, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Gower:  Done --Igor123121 18:46, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
    It's the same picture with burnt sky but cropped. --Gower 20:00, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Gower:  Done? --Igor123121 20:37, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki --Igor123121 15:45, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:34, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Auricularia auricula-judae in Bytom, Poland --Gower 15:06, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:34, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Christoph Tempel gravestone, cemetery in Chorzów, Poland --Gower 14:40, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Comment Too dark, please brighten it up --Jakubhal 05:48, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
    It's night shot, imho details are visible --Gower 14:59, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Sorry, but I am not convinced the tombstone picture should be that dark. Feel free to move it to CR if you disagree --Jakubhal 04:56, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View from Zedernweg to the Church of St. Petri in Wörlitz --Romzig 13:24, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Looks tilted, shadows are too dark --Poco a poco 14:33, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Manhole cover near the White tower. Thessaloniki, Greece. --Красный 11:37, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Why are this pics so low in res (8 MPx) when the camera can provide more than twice that res? --Poco a poco 14:32, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
    Cutting to the square. I have 50mm and 20mm lenses and while 50mm is not enough in most cases to take pictures of manhole covers, 20mm gives you a very wide empty frame around the object (or distort picture if you filming too close). So cropping, cropping and, again, cropping --Красный 14:56, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Thanks for the explanations. But this case, I think it is too noisy and a bit blurred. --Sebring12Hrs 20:12, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Can't lens distortion be fixed during processing / raw conversion? --Plozessor 09:06, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Plozessor: why to photoshop more, not less? Why to draw picture instead of creating it? Lvova 09:39, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose I didn't talk about photoshopping, but about fixing lens distortion during raw conversion by applying a lens-specific profile. If you take a picture of a flat object then it should resemble how the object looks in reality. If it does not, this is a photograhic defect from lens distortion, and it can be fixed by using the correct lens profile. Some cameras do that internally for the JPG files they save, but not for RAW files obviously; if you convert the raw files, you (or your software) needs to take care of the lens profile. --Plozessor 04:08, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Paul the Apostle church view from the observation deck. Saloniki, Greece. --Красный 11:37, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Nice but needs a little PC correction. --Gower 14:54, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Yenidze in Dresden, seen from the Heinz-Steyer-Stadion --Romzig 09:30, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Quite good but very underexposed --Benjism89 11:09, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
    Thanks for the reviews. The light was poor when I took the photos. I've already adjusted the brightness quite a bit, but I don't think anything more would make sense. I like it, even if it's a bit dark. --Romzig 11:25, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Volvo XC60 (SPA) in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 09:03, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Nice, but lack of detail in dark spots (clipped) --Gower 17:18, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Audi RS e-tron GT in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 09:03, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Nice, but lack of detail in dark spots (clipped) --Gower 17:18, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Eiffel tower at night reflecting in the Seine in Paris, France (2) --Giles Laurent 08:48, 11 October 2025 (UTC)  Comment The picture is slightly tilted to the left --Imehling 11:47, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Basilica of the Sacred Heart of Montmartre in Paris at night (1) --Giles Laurent 08:48, 11 October 2025 (UTC)  Comment I think some perspective correction would improve the picture --Imehling 11:47, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Per Imehling, otherwise good ! --Sebring12Hrs 14:20, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Litochoro --Lvova 08:04, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Loutra Volvis --Lvova 08:04, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Birds flying around a traffic circle in Mysore, Karnataka, India (2024) (by Naveen R Gowda) --Gpkp 07:36, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    It needs noise removal and a perspective correction --Poco a poco 14:51, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Lakshmi Narayana Temple, Hosaholalu, Karnataka, India (2020) (by Naveen R Gowda) --Gpkp 07:36, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Maybe vertical perspective correction? --Gower 17:18, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Humayun's Tomb, Delhi, India (2019) (by Naveen R Gowda) --Gpkp 07:36, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:34, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025, Kraków, Kamienica Jaroszowska, Ulica Szpitalna 8 --Igor123121 06:39, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 21:49, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Kamienica Celestowska, Ulica Mikołajska 10 --Igor123121 06:39, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Nice, but I suggest horizontal PC to achieve parallel view. --Gower 17:18, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Gower: I understand, I’ll try next time. I hope this photo is correct. --Igor123121 18:49, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Temple of Hercules (San Marco d'Alunzio, ME) uploaded for WLM Sicily (by Matthias Süßen) but was unforeseen, uncatalogued so disqualified --GiovanniPen 05:23, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:34, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Open wing Nectaring activity of Papilio clytia Linnaeus, 1758 - Common Mime ( Form - dissimilis) . By User:Sandipoutsider --Atudu 02:14, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Blue CAs on the right wing, this can easily be corrected --Syntaxys 02:29, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
    I am also waiting for chromatic aberration reduction. --Gower 16:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

October 10, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Beach umbrealls stacked at the end of the season in Sarti, Chalkidiki, Greece --Kritzolina 19:16, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Highlights clipped. --Gower 17:18, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lethe maitrya (de Nicéville, 1881) - Barred Woodbrown. By User:Atanu Bose Photography --Atudu 14:43, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Please add the proper categories, not just that the one for the competition. Where has this photo been taken? Please complete the description. --AFBorchert 23:18, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
    category added. --Atudu 02:11, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 11:57, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025. Kraków, Teatr im. Juliusza Słowackiego, Plac Świętego Ducha --Igor123121 13:48, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    PC correction needed, tilted a bit. --Gower 17:18, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Gower:  Done --Igor123121 18:52, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
    Better but still not parallel everywhere --Gower 20:17, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Togg T10X at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 12:14, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Nice, but dark areas are clipped out. --Gower 17:18, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Holy Trinity church in Jeleniów 1 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 11:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Blue tinted branches to correction --Gower 13:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Gallicrex cinerea in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 11:36, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Nice, but try correct red chromatic aberration (legs) --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)@Gower: I am sorry but I don't see any chromatic aberration, I tried the lens filter though but nothing changes. I only see a bit of motion blur in the leg. You may oppose if this image is not up to the mark. Thank you.
• 
  • Nomination Iveco Daily Electric dumper at IAA Transportation 2024 --MB-one 10:37, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lvova 09:48, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rear doors of a Iveco Crossway at Busworld Europe 2023 --MB-one 10:37, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lvova 09:48, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Hollowroot in the FFH-area Isarauen von Unterföhring bis Landshut in Marzling --FlocciNivis 08:40, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Pretty but only hollowroot on the left is in focus. --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Water tower at Natur-Park Schöneberger Südgelände --FlocciNivis 08:40, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Looks good but... could the tilt be fixed? --AFBorchert 10:07, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
    I tried to fix that now --FlocciNivis 14:33, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Thanks for fixing this. Good quality. --AFBorchert 07:08, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The Emile-Béthouart-Steg in Innsbruck --FlocciNivis 08:40, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    This is a nice composition with the bridge in front. However, it is tilted. Could you fix this? But I am also afraid that the crop will be worse after rotating it (for example, the church tower). --AFBorchert 10:07, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stream of muddy water at Karura Forest, Nairobi, KenyaI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Brihaspati 06:49, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 06:49, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Waterfall at Karura Forest, Nairobi, Kenya --Brihaspati 06:49, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Too much saturation, chromatic aberration near white areas, colour noise in shadows. --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Gower: uploaded a new version by changing saturation and sharpness.--Brihaspati 09:37, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Brihaspati 06:49, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Change nomination note, please. Describe the picture. --Gower 17:17, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
    Both rhinos are not sharp and partly covered by grass. --Екатерина Борисова 21:57, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

October 9, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Building in Moscow --Perituss 23:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    chromatic aberration to fix --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Balcony of Ryabushinsky House, Moscow, Russia. By User:ElenaLitera --Екатерина Борисова 22:11, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    PC needed --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
    Absolutely not. The horizons here are horizontal, the verticals are vertical, and everything else has an irregular shape in real life (see in the category). --Екатерина Борисова 03:39, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View across the pond Prinzenweiher in Saarbrücken --FlocciNivis 20:59, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Beautiful photograph. But there is a dust spot on the lake in the lower right corner of the image. Could you please remove it? --AFBorchert 21:52, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Done --FlocciNivis 14:36, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Thanks for fixing it. Good quality. --AFBorchert 14:47, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Wolf's milk slime mould (Lycogala epidendrum) -- George Chernilevsky 18:23, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Nice, but not very sharp --Gower 18:47, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Stolberg Castle: Castle courtyard with entrance to the castle --Romzig 18:13, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    slightly unfavorable contrast and too bright clouds --Gower 19:03, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View from Ebersberg near Hohegeiß in the Harz Mountains --Romzig 18:13, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    post-processing is unfavorable, the photo looks like it was taken from a cell phone (denoising? high contrast?) --Gower 19:03, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Closing ceremony of Wikimania 2024 in Katowice --MB-one 16:38, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Faces aren't very sharp --Gower 19:03, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Porsche 968 Sportcoupe at Techno-Classica 2024, Essen --MB-one 16:38, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:20, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Ford Sierra RS Cosworth Mk1 at Techno-Classica 2025 --MB-one 16:38, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Good technically, but composition isn't perfect due that guy and yellow car. --Gower 18:57, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Storozhevaya Tower from the village of Torgovishche, Suksunsky district: Khokhlovka, Perm district, Perm Krai.--AlixSaz 15:39, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Toom much sky, maybe different cropping? --Gower 19:03, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki --Igor123121 13:29, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Kraków, ul. Augustiańska 9, Kościół św. Katarzyny Aleksandryjskiej i św. Małgorzaty --Igor123121 13:29, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Tilted. Please straighten. --E bailey 14:41, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
    @E bailey: I sent the corrected version yesterday before adding it here. Unfortunately, it hasn’t been updated yet. Sorry for the inconvenience. --Igor123121 14:50, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
    @E bailey:  Done --Igor123121 18:52, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
    I don't see any new versions of this file. Last version was 9 October. --E bailey 22:08, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Previously unassessed Magda Barasku's sleeve --Lvova 07:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Maybe stronger cropping? --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
    ok. --Lvova 18:11, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025 Poznań, Okrąglak w Poznaniu --Igor123121 04:22, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review Good quality. --Llez 05:13, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
    Crooked a bit, correctio needed. --Gower 05:52, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Gower:  Done --Igor123121 13:38, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
    Still PC not corrected well. --Gower 20:17, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

October 8, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Krombach (Lower Franconia), Schulberg 10, War Memorial --KaiBorgeest 21:46, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Too much empty space at the top and on the right IMO --Lmbuga 23:06, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View along the Hotel Añaza in Acorán, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 17:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Interesting motif and subject, but the horizon is not horizontal. Please, check also the verticality after having rotated the image. --Harlock81 19:19, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Done --FlocciNivis 14:39, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Demonstrations and protests in Nepal in 2025 --Bijay Chaurasia 16:32, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Strange description. I don't see any demonstrations and protests here. --Екатерина Борисова 22:18, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Sri vari swarana radham at Tirupati --I.Mahesh 04:16, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Appears to be tilted. Could you please fix this? --AFBorchert 11:05, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    I love this one. But isn't it a bit tilted? --Harmonide 16:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

October 7, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Ratusz dawnej jurydyki Garbary, Ulica Karmelicka 12 (1) --Igor123121 16:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    not very favorable composition and framing, it's a pity that the entire façade was not included --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Gower: Thank you for your comment, but I don’t really understand how I should respond to it. True, the composition may not be the most favorable, but I am waiting for a vote for or against. We shouldn’t dwell on the past, for example that a photo of the whole building wasn’t taken, etc. I would also like to remind you that when commenting on multiple photos, you don’t need to redirect each one to the discussion; you can also use the comment function. --Igor123121 18:48, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 09:09, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination XPeng P7+ at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 16:15, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    IMHO loss of detail in shadows --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:06, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Avatr 12 at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 16:15, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    IMHO loss of detail in shadows --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:07, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The main entrance of Ujjayanta Palace, Agartala, Tripura --Herpking 13:57, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 19:12, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: IndiGo Airbus A320-251N - VT-IXA at Maharaja Bir Bikram Airport (IXA) --Herpking 13:57, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Vigneting, perspective correction needed, too soft --Poco a poco 19:21, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Baneswar Shiva Temple, Baneswar, Cooch Behar, WB --Herpking 13:57, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    I am sorry, in my opinion it is underexposed and needs perspective correction. --Lmbuga 16:22, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    The building is slightly tilted. Could you please fix this? --AFBorchert 16:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

October 6, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: View along a building of the Ensemble Brauerei Becker. --FlocciNivis 16:34, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Nice but high CA on trees branches and overexposed sky. --Gower 17:59, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 09:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Dom Długosza w Krakowie --Igor123121 15:56, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Composition doesn't highlight the main theme: door --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. And the main topic here is definetely not a door, but a portal. Lvova 09:12, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Portal of course, not the door, but photo was cropped in the meantime --Gower 13:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Gower: @Lvova:  Done --Igor123121 12:51, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Aerial view of the US Army urban warfare training site in Mainz-Finthen --MB-one 18:26, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    A bit random composition and perspective. --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 09:10, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Wladzimer Rusakovich. First day of Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2025. --Красный 08:25, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Pink shirt from the left, maybe different cropping? --Gower 17:59, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 08:54, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Augustinian convent in Crémieu, Isere, France. --Tournasol7 20:38, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Nice, but the wall of the right has a purple fringe. --Sebring12Hrs 21:19, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    Upper left area: Clear CAs and strong blue halo on the corner--Lmbuga 21:21, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View from the hydroelectric power plant Pielweichs to the South on the Isar --FlocciNivis 16:34, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Is it me, or is the image tilted CW? Also quite warm WB for that early in the afternoon, even in February. --MB-one 16:30, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Aqua Pour Homme Eau de Toilette is a fresh, masculine fragrance designed with a sleek and modern aesthetic.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This media has been uploaded as a part of Project Korikath --A S M Jobaer 09:56, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    I think, this should be in portrait mode, rather than landscape. Otherwise ok --MB-one 16:30, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Silea hydroelectric power station --Kallerna 06:20, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Needs slight perspective correction (not parallel vertical lines of the building) --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Thanks, fixed! --Kallerna 04:55, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025, Poznań, bazylika archikatedralna Świętych Apostołów Piotra i Pawła w Poznaniu --Igor123121 04:47, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Wrong (too strong) perspective; the walls look as if they are narrowing inwards --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Gower:  Done --Igor123121 12:51, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025, Poznań, bazylika archikatedralna Świętych Apostołów Piotra i Pawła w Poznaniu --Igor123121 04:47, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Column is a bit tilted. --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Just a comment, so I'm formatting it as a comment again. @Gower: , pay attention pls. --Lvova 14:51, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Gower:  Done --Igor123121 15:56, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. Lacking nice light but acceptable. --Gower 08:44, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

October 5, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: 2025, ul. Długa 5, Kraków, Dom Pod Głowami --Igor123121 07:37, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Side window portals unnecessarily cut --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 09:19, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Anastasiya Lvova. Learning day of Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2025. --Красный 10:31, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Good quality but a bit random composition (hand of another guy, empty bottle) --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 09:16, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Коровник (Музей-заповедник В.Д. Поленова). --Celest 17:36, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Overprocessed, a lot of burned out spots. Too intense contrast. --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Just a comment, so I'm formatting it as a comment again. @Gower: , pay attention pls. --Lvova 14:51, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sidi Ahmed Mosque --User:Mounir Neddi 15:07, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Needs perspective correction. Power line/cable distracts from subject.. --E bailey 15:25, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Issues not addressed. --E bailey 14:17, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Christos Varvantakis. Learning day of Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2025. --Красный 10:31, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Maybe different heavier cropping could be better? --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Kamienica (schronisko brata Alberta) --Igor123121 07:37, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 11:25, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Sebring12Hrs:  Done :) --Igor123121 18:46, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    Thanks for your effort, perspective is ok, but the crop is may be too tight. Other opinion ? --Sebring12Hrs 21:49, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    chromatic aberration to reduction (sky) --Gower 20:17, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Gower:  Done --Igor123121 15:56, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

October 4, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: A building in Scholari --Lvova 00:05, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Bizarre composition, image shows a road or a building? --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    Surprisingly both. Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 08:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Schwalbe bicycle tires at Cycling World Europe 2025 --MB-one 22:01, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    First tire not very sharp --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Participants of ADAC Deutschland Klassik 2025 entering Alte Brücke ("Old Bridge") in Heidelberg --MB-one 22:01, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Half of image is the road, not very pretty composition. --Gower 13:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Done cropped in significantly. Thanks for the review --MB-one 09:49, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Neel and Anita Tamang are Nepali workers who build Pakbu (Ladakhi mudbrick) in Shey village, Ladakh. --Satdeep Gill 16:50, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Needs a precise description and caption. CATs could also be improved. --Tagooty 04:24, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
     Done @Tagooty: --Satdeep Gill 06:46, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    The DoF is marginal, too much in the composition. Cropping to the bricks in front and left centre will make a better image, IMO. --Tagooty 08:46, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Neel and Anita Tamang are Nepali workers who build Pakbu (Ladakhi mudbrick) in Shey village, Ladakh. --Satdeep Gill 16:50, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Trees look a bit tilted --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View across a field adjacent to the bird sanctuary Ismaninger Speichersee und Fischteiche with the alps and tower cranes in the background --FlocciNivis 10:52, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    I see some dust spots. --Lvova 09:54, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025 Kraków, Kościół św. Katarzyny Aleksandryjskiej i św. Małgorzaty w Krakowie --Igor123121 06:59, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Crooked a bit. --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Done --Igor123121 17:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025 Przemyśl, Pałac biskupów gr.-kat., Plac Tadeusza Czackiego 3 w Przemyślu --Igor123121 06:59, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Perspective correction needed, vertical lines of a building aren't parallel --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Done --Igor123121 17:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    'Hieroglyphic artifacts' in dark parts of tree/bush at front. --Gower 20:17, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Gower:  Done --Igor123121 15:56, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: ZIL-130 at Seifullin avenue at the corner with Gogol street. Almaty, Kazakhstan. --Красный 06:47, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Acceptable but ZIL is blending with bus behind it --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Façade detail, Avenida Fontes Pereira de Melo 39, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 04:01, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Quite dark --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    I think you're right, uploaded a brighter version, thanks! --Julesvernex2 20:18, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pomona statue (detail) in Upper Gardens of Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:11, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Sculpture surface is not very detailed --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose The sky is posterized and sharpness is borderline in the shadows. There is also an artifact or a dust spot. --Sebring12Hrs 21:16, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Sebring12Hrs: I won't argue about sharpness, just want to say the the sky is absolutely natural here. I didn't process this photo at all. -- Екатерина Борисова 15:37, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

October 3, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: 2025 Kraków, Warneńczyka 10-Rejtana 15 --Igor123121 04:55, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    PC is needed. Look at the verticals at left (red/orange building) and may be a bit underexposed. --Sebring12Hrs 08:07, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Sebring12Hrs:  Done :) --Igor123121 18:46, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    Could you increase exposure a bit ? --Sebring12Hrs 20:44, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    A bit dark. --Harmonide 00:46, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 09:29, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Done --Igor123121 17:17, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
    The sky is now completly posterized. --Sebring12Hrs 21:15, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Sebring12Hrs:  Done --Igor123121 15:56, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Ireland, Clonmacnoise, Temple Melaghlin --Berthold Werner 15:57, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Some CAs on the walls, especially at left. Otherwise good. --Sebring12Hrs 20:34, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    Isn't it a bit tilted? --Harmonide 00:32, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 09:26, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Theresiastraat in The Hague --ReneeWrites 22:30, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Perspective correction needed. --Gower 13:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Done ReneeWrites 13:58, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025 Poznań, Kamienica Grodzickich --Igor123121 04:55, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Distorted (due to perspective correction I suppose). Judging by the other photos in the category, the upper part of the portal should be horizontal, but here it's concave. --Екатерина Борисова 05:17, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Екатерина Борисова:  Done --Igor123121 06:07, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    Sorry, but it's still concave. --Екатерина Борисова 02:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

October 2, 2025

• 
  • Nomination Street "Bielkenhagen" in the old town of Stralsund, a Unesco site --MB-one 08:56, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Maybe different cropping to eliminate bottom shadow? --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good like that. No need to remove this shadow. --Sebring12Hrs 10:35, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

October 1, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: View over Thessaloniki from Pyrgos Aliseos --Kritzolina 09:45, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    A bit too dark on the settlement IMO --MB-one 11:59, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: UlicaGenerałaStanisławaSosabowskiego-ŚcieżkiRowerowe-PrądnikBiały-POL, Kraków --Igor123121 05:45, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    It needs a perspective correction --Poco a poco 08:45, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Poco a poco:  Done --Igor123121 06:23, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    Better now, there is though some noise and CA, can you please remove them? --Poco a poco 06:22, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    Not very detailed but acceptable. --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

September 30, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: A water pump in the Natur-Park Schöneberger Südgelände --FlocciNivis 16:29, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Color grading reminds analogue vintage picture, it is intentional? CA (wires) --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Volkswagen stand at IAA Open Space 2023 in Munich --MB-one 13:17, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Little CA on WV logo. --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

September 29, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Common snipe (Gallinago gallinago faeroeensis) --Charlesjsharp 08:36, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    low contrast and strange WB (too purple) IMO --George Chernilevsky 20:28, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
    Very nice. But I agree for the low contrast. Can it be fixed? --Harmonide 00:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 09:28, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The house at the Rheinallee 61 in Mainz --FlocciNivis 17:17, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    The bottom crop is too tight. --Sebring12Hrs 08:04, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

September 26, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Christo Botewa street, view from E, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 07:58, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Probably it's possible to crop the right side - there is a PC problem and anyway this lifting edge is just sticking out. --Lvova 20:38, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Lvova:  Done --Igor123121 06:23, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    Probably you didn't upload it. --Lvova 08:53, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    Visibly tilted. --Gower 08:41, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Consensual review

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

• To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
• You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
• The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.

Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.

Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted

• In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
• Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add  Oppose and  Support if necessary.
• Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
• Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".

File:2025,_Kraków,_Kamienica_Lisia_Jama.jpg

• Nomination 2025, Kraków, Kamienica Lisia Jama --Igor123121 16:11, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose Unfixed barrel distortion (look at gutters). --Gower 18:56, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
  So go to CR.... --Sebring12Hrs 20:39, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Info Implicit opposing vote added. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:35, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:35, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

File:BE_SER_Tribute_to_Vanfleteren.png

• Nomination Picture made in the beglium Quarter of Ougreé, Liège --Grunpfnul 14:46, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Too noisy. --Sebring12Hrs 15:29, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

• Its a Picture on tri-x - it has to be Noisy… --Grunpfnul 16:46, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment I don't know what is "tri-x" but this explanation doesn't convince me. --Sebring12Hrs 17:57, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

• It’s a film made by Kodak --Grunpfnul 21:33, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

• Aaaaahhhh ! Sorry ! Not esay to judge. But I think you are right. I agree that noise should remain on a chemical processe. Removing the grain, as is sometimes done on certain old Blu-ray films, removes the authenticity of the technique. So I cancel my vote, but I don't know if I could support. --Sebring12Hrs 18:21, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose I'm sorry, but from what you say, it could be FP, but QI, hardly: the noise is alarming, the details are poor (I can mark the lack of detail with a note, how could I not, if I can't even imagine the material of the bricks), the intention is exclusively artistic (it doesn't fit in here at all). --Lmbuga 22:08, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment Guys, this isn't noise, it's film grain. The Kodak Tri-X is (was?) a high-sensitivity B&W film with big metallic silver halide particles that produce this gritty texture. I don't know if this image deserves the QI stamp (e.g., the focus doesn't seem to be on the wall), but I don't think it should be rejected on the basis of having film grain. --Julesvernex2 10:46, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

• @Julesvernex2: I acknowledge the noise due to my lack of knowledge. I note that the ‘noise’ does not affect the sharpness. I reject the image because of its intention and for what it is. It may be that I am very confused.--Lmbuga 11:23, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

• I share that confusion. It's not easy to apply the QI guidelines to film images, which do not benefit from noise reduction, sharpening, lens corrections, perspective correction, and a myriad of other comforts of digital photography. Whatever the outcome though, thank you to the nominator for this very interesting image. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 13:17, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

• Sorry, at this moment, I do not feel qualified to comment on this photograph. I believe it would be unfair for me to give my opinion. I no longer have an opinion, but if I did, it would not be negative. --Lmbuga 15:28, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support This is excellent photo even if the formal requirements of the digital age preclude it from being considered "quality." Although, in my opinion, "quality" of a photo implies the ability to make a high-quality large-format print from it. The size and quality of this scan, I believe, would allow for a print up to 30x40 cm without any visible defects. Film grain, by the way, can be an additional artistic touch, enhancing the impression of the print, and the grain of this Tri-X film looks nice. I vote for this "warm analog" photo as "quality," and I would gladly vote for it in the "Image of the Day" nominations. Vsatinet (talk) 14:03, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:26, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Le_Quesnoy,_vue_de_la_rue_du_Maréchal_Joffre_IA59005682.jpg

• Nomination rue du Maréchal Joffre, Le Quesnoy --Pierre André Leclercq 14:46, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 15:31, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose Lack of detail. Sorry, It's not QI imo. See the area with the bricks on the right-hand side of the photo, where the street signs are located. --Lmbuga 22:25, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:27, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Lublin_Chopina_6_bank_night.jpg

• Nomination Lublin, bank at 6 Chopina Street at night. --Gower 07:20, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Support Good quality. --Igor123121 07:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose Too blurry and has disturbing lens flares --Ermell 08:43, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose per Ermell --George Chernilevsky 12:03, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:28, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Gliwice_Las_Dabrowa_forest.jpg

• Nomination Gliwice, Las Dąbrowa nature reserve. --Gower 07:20, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Support Good quality. --Igor123121 07:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose Nice view, but nothing is in focus here. --Екатерина Борисова 22:33, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:28, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Katowice_Mickiewicza_5_north.jpg

• Nomination Katowice, 5 Mickiewicza Street, former baths --Gower 07:20, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Support Good quality. --Igor123121 07:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose Noise should be reduced --Ermell 08:46, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:29, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Orange_Fungus_Eucalyptus_Ooty_Oct25_A7CR_07947.jpg

• Nomination Orange fungus on the north side of a eucalyptus tree, Forest Gate, Ooty, India --Tagooty 03:15, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:21, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose Lack of sufficient ID. By the way, this might well be a lichen. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:15, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:29, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

File:White_Fungus_Eucalyptus_Ooty_Oct25_A7CR_07949.jpg

• Nomination White fungus on a eucalyptus tree, Forest Gate, Ooty, The Nilgiris --Tagooty 03:15, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:21, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
   OpposeLack of sufficient ID. In addition, the top part and the left side of the fungus might be overexposed (lack of detail) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:15, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Robert Flogaus-Faust. In my opinion the detail is not good--Lmbuga 14:53, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:30, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

File:DSC00752_San_Salvator_Laur.jpg

• Nomination San Salvatore in Lauro --Rione Colonna 09:47, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
  Please make the image little bit sharp. Increase the highlight. --Brihaspati 10:20, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  Done. Thank you--Rione Colonna 11:03, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose Color noise in the sky. --Sebring12Hrs 12:14, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  done.thank you --Rione Colonna 07:11, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:30, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Moscow._Church_of_the_Theotokos_of_the_Sign_P4162263_2750.jpg

• Nomination Moscow. Church of the Theotokos of the Sign --Alexxx1979 07:54, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Support Good qual;ity --Michielverbeek 08:06, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose Some verticals are done, some are not, the result is unnaturally disctorted, the building is falling down. --Lvova 09:42, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
   Support The church is not vertikal. Compare with the new building in background. --Mike1979 Russia 08:16, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:32, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Bottom_White_Fungus_Eucalyptus_Ooty_Oct25_A7CR_07953.jpg

• Nomination White fungus (low view) on a eucalyptus tree, Forest Gate, Ooty, India --Tagooty 06:42, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:15, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose "White fungus" and Category:Unidentified fungi of Tamil Nadu is a too general identification IMO. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 08:55, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

 Oppose In my opinion the detail is not good: There is no insect that can be clearly seen. --Lmbuga 14:57, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:24, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Chorzow_Staudinger_Patzig_grave.jpg

• Nomination Staudinger family gravestone, cemetery in Chorzów, Poland --Gower 14:40, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Oppose The grave on the right is blurry. --Igor123121 20:41, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  @Igor123121: , I am aware of that, but I don't think it's a problem here. One grave is main theme, the other, located further is just background or addition. --Gower 20:44, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
   Comment Too dark, please brighten it up --Jakubhal 05:48, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  It's night shot, imho details are visible --Gower 14:59, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  Please don't cancel "decline" vote. --Sebring12Hrs 20:44, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose Sorry, but I am not convinced the tombstone picture should be that dark --Jakubhal 04:56, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

 Oppose Per others and white balance IMO--Lmbuga 15:00, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:23, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2025._Kraków,_Teatr_im._Juliusza_Słowackiego,_Plac_Świętego_Ducha_(26).jpg

• Nomination 2025. Kraków, Teatr im. Juliusza Słowackiego, Plac Świętego Ducha --Igor123121 13:48, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Oppose Nice try, but not sharp, and the crop is too tight. --Екатерина Борисова 21:53, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
   Support Not so bad to me. The crop is acceptable and sharpness good. --Sebring12Hrs 09:15, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:22, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Kraków,_Kamienica_Pod_Złotą_Głową_w_Krakowie_2025.jpg

• Nomination Kraków, Kamienica Pod Złotą Głową w Krakowie 2025 --Igor123121 15:56, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Oppose crooked photo (see line of windows) --Gower 16:07, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  @Gower:  Done By the way, you used the template incorrectly :) --Igor123121 16:26, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  Still tilted. --Gower 20:17, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  @Gower:  Done --Igor123121 15:56, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
   Info Moving this to CR. Please set to "/Discuss" once there is a vote that you disagree with, not to "/Nomination". --Robert Flogaus-Faust 08:59, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:21, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Top_White_Fungus_Eucalyptus_Ooty_Oct25_A7CR_07950.jpg

• Nomination White fungus (top view) on a eucalyptus tree, Forest Gate, Ooty, India --Tagooty 03:15, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:26, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose Sorry, but this image is completly unsharp. --Syntaxys 05:10, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

 Oppose lacking details --Gower 08:38, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

 Oppose Sorry, Syntaxys is right, I initially misjudged the photo.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:11, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

 Oppose Also insufficient ID. I stroke out the supporting vote by Famberhorst because he added an opposing vote later. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 08:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:03, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2025,_Kraków,_Park_Strzelecki_w_Krakowie,_17.jpg

• Nomination 2025, Kraków, Park Strzelecki w Krakowie --Igor123121 13:48, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
  The previous version had 5,535 × 3,138 pixels--Lmbuga 14:25, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
   Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 15:02, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose Downscaled. --Sebring12Hrs 15:46, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  @Sebring12Hrs:  Done --Igor123121 16:04, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
   Comment When promoting the pictures, I should have mentioned that a new and correct version had been uploaded for all the pictures. I verified this when I promoted them.--Lmbuga 18:11, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:04, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2025,_Kraków,_Park_Strzelecki_w_Krakowie,_12.jpg

• Nomination 2025, Kraków, Park Strzelecki w Krakowie --Igor123121 13:48, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
  The metadata says 3,376 x 6,000 px and the picture is 2,100 × 3,732 pixels. The previous version had 3,376 × 6,000. --Lmbuga 14:23, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
   Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 15:04, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose PC is needed. Could you improve the perspective without downscale the image ? --Sebring12Hrs 15:45, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  @Sebring12Hrs:  Done --Igor123121 16:04, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

 Comment When promoting the pictures, I should have mentioned that a new and correct version had been uploaded for all the pictures. I verified this when I promoted them. --Lmbuga (talk) 08:26, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:06, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2025,_Kraków,_Park_Strzelecki_w_Krakowie,_1.jpg

• Nomination 2025, Kraków, Park Strzelecki w Krakowie --Igor123121 13:48, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
  The previous version had 3,376 x 6000 pixels. --Lmbuga 14:28, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
   Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 15:06, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose Dust spots. --Sebring12Hrs 15:45, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  @Sebring12Hrs:  Done --Igor123121 16:04, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

 Comment When promoting the pictures, I should have mentioned that a new and correct version had been uploaded for all the pictures. I verified this when I promoted them. --Lmbuga (talk) 08:27, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Courtrai_le_sjouwer.jpg

• Nomination View of the Sjouwer, monument to Belgian migrants and cross-border workers, Burgemeester Margostraat, in Kortrijk, Belgium --Velvet 08:51, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Sorry, the monument (your picture motive) is almost not present. --2015 Michael 2015 09:21, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support This is a view of the monument, and may be it could be named "remote view", but not a good reason to decline IMO. --Sebring12Hrs 10:39, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support I agree with Sebring12Hrs here. The monument is to be seen with its surrounding landscape. Such photos can be quite helpful and valuable. Good quality is given. --AFBorchert 12:18, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support per others. --Smial 14:04, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Nice composition. Brownie points for using a Foveon sensor, thought those greens look familiar :) --Julesvernex2 15:34, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:48, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Norderney,_Strand,_Badebereich_--_2025_--_9141.jpg

• Nomination Swimming area marking (with red and yellow flag as swimming zone boundary) on the beach, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 06:05, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Only the first post in focus. Needs more DoF and focus point shifted back. --Tagooty 07:38, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

• The first post is deliberately sharp to distinguish it from the background. Since the ones further away are smaller anyway, there is no need to make them sharp as well. --XRay 08:00, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment I'm sorry that another discussion is necessary. Discussions are always time-consuming. But there are photos where, unfortunately, opinions differ. Here, I see no need for consistent, far-reaching sharpness. The first post is sharp, and that's what's important. Whether you like the photo or not may be a matter of opinion. That doesn't affect the quality. --XRay 08:03, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment It won't leave me alone... Even though this only applies indirectly to this photo, I would like to comment on it. Bokeh and depth of field are good for creative photos, but they are also part of every photographer's toolkit. A blurred background helps you to consciously focus on the important object. Distracting objects in the background (or foreground) are then no longer significant. Not every camera and lens allows this to be used in a clear way, but that doesn't mean you can't use it. I ask you to consider this. Just try it out with your own photos and dare to be more creative. Photography should be fun. And QI should also reflect the possibilities of photography with good photos. We already have so many categories that represent the possibilities. --XRay 08:29, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

• I appreciate deliberate blurring and bokeh. In this case, I don't think it is effective, my subjective opinion. I also appreciate art photography. Per current guidelines QI is about photo-realism, so art photography usually does not fit into QI. It may fit into VI and FP. --Tagooty 09:52, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • QI and FP are based on the same guidelines, but FP is special. VI has a different objective. I don't see any photographic art here either. Sorry, but in my opinion, blurred areas alone do not constitute photographic art. Photorealistic is not realistic, I think we both know that. Our eyes work differently than a lens. While our eyes suggest great sharpness, with a lens you have to decide on a setting. Focusing on a sharp subject helps with the composition. These are normal rules of composition. I really don't see any contradiction with the QI guidelines. --XRay 09:44, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Obviously intentional use of low DOF. No other issues. --Smial 10:11, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Per XRay and Smial, a shallow depth-of-field is a well established technique across most genres of photography, including landscapes. At 300mm, getting all the poles in focus would require a focus stack (nearly impossible to do with moving waves) and would result, in my opinion, in a lesser image. PS: Out of curiosity, what are those white crosses in the background? An offshore wind farm? --Julesvernex2 13:45, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

• This is the offshore wind farm in the North Sea off Norderney. --XRay 12:40, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Intentional use of this DOF. Good quality--Lmbuga 15:06, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:49, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Volkswagen_Golf_IV_Cabriolet_IMG_3972_(cropped).jpg

• Nomination Volkswagen Golf IV Cabriolet in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 08:39, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Oppose Image quality isn't impressive, lack of detail in dark spots (clipped) --Gower 17:18, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
   Support Not impressive, but Ok IMHO --Velvet 09:06, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Info Implicit supporting vote clarified. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:50, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:50, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

File:St._Valentin_(Bergham),_2024-09-07.jpg

• Nomination Die Kirche St. Valentin in Bergham im Sommer 2024. --2015 Michael 2015 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Oppose Strongly distorted. --Lvova 17:57, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  @Lvova You have seen the pictures in the related category? My photograph is well developed, i.e. what you are writing is not correct! --2015 Michael 2015 10:26, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  @2015 Michael 2015: Yes, I saw. So I'm returning Decline status, because you should not change my voice with a comment. If you want to have CR - you may use /Discuss. Lvova 20:18, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  I don't know what user Lvova is writing here, someone who is familiar with architecture photograph should make a review, please. --2015 Michael 2015 09:03, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
   Support Perspective correction with a church tower in front is always a challenge and some compromise. PC was done properly and it is not more distorted as through the direct result of PC. This is for me of good quality. --AFBorchert 12:02, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose Too distorted and looks very unnatural. If it were a human, you could say, "It looks like a man's neck has been wrung." P.S. Your comment about user Lvova looks offensive. -- Екатерина Борисова 15:22, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose Perspective correction has resulted in too much distortion. --E bailey 14:57, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

 Oppose The floor plan of the tower appears to be rhomboidal rather than square.--Lmbuga 15:09, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:51, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Main_entrance_of_Sansad_Bhavan_of_Nepal_After_GenZ_Protest-070A6043.jpg

• Nomination Main entrance of Sansad Bhavan of Nepal (International Convention Centre Nepal) After GenZ Protest8,9 September 2025, --Bijay Chaurasia 10:36, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
  A bit noisy. Tilted and needs perspective correction. --Lmbuga 13:03, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  New file updated with NR and Perspective Correction --Bijay Chaurasia 08:13, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose I still see problems with perspective and tilt. Now I also see CAs. --Lmbuga 14:06, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:52, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Night_Aerial_View,_Zengjiao_Lijiao,_S81_Guangzhou_Ring_Expressway,_Liwan_District,_Guangzhou.jpg

• Nomination An interchange in Guangzhou, China. --YikyuenG 15:14, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Gower 17:18, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Very impressive, and almost sharp overall, but the right top corner is too blurred. --Sebring12Hrs 20:06, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Sebring12Hrs Jakubhal 09:12, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Sebring12Hrs 18:13, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Matka_Boska_Bytomska_icon.jpg

• Nomination Matka Boska Bytomska icon --Gower 14:56, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Downscaled (1896 × 2256 instead of possible 4928 × 3264). --Lvova 20:10, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

   Oppose per Lvova --Igor123121 20:41, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

• @Lvova: it wasn't downscaled but cropped from bigger picture. That painting is behind the steel grate. --Gower 20:42, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Acceptable resolution and quality. --Plozessor 05:43, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support As the author says, it appears to be a crop from a larger image, not a downscaling. To the opponents - these aren’t revenge votes because of Gower’s critical reviews, right? Jakubhal 05:55, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

  If you see that I declined all his images, then yes. If you don't see such behavior, it would be better not to say such things at all and say sorry. Lvova 07:50, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

  Oh, it’s mostly a question for Igor, because I’ve seen a lot of exchanges between him and Gower lately. But you also had some interactions because of the mess Gower made with the voting a few days ago, among other things. So I’m really glad that’s not the case with you. Jakubhal 08:57, 12 October 2025 (UTC) Ok, this has been clarified with Igor. Jakubhal 16:32, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 10:23, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Lvova 07:50, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

File:1009_Basilica_of_the_Sacred_Heart_of_Montmartre_in_Paris_at_night_Photo_by_Giles_Laurent.jpg

• Nomination Basilica of the Sacred Heart of Montmartre in Paris at night (2) --Giles Laurent 08:48, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 09:04, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I spot an artifact. Could you remove it please ? Otherwise good. --Sebring12Hrs 14:20, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

  See note. --Sebring12Hrs 14:20, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

  I don't have access to my computer right now but I'll have a closer look once I do -- --Giles Laurent 21:46, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support The image looks a bit oversaturated but it is impressive and technical good -- Spurzem 16:52, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Lvova 18:44, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

File:30.09.25_in_Litochoro_06.jpg

• Nomination Litochoro. The horizon is ok here - the street is not horizontal. --Lvova 08:04, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose picture composition: 50 % of the pic are asphalt --2015 Michael 2015 15:42, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

• So what? The view of the street is like that, and it gives an information about roads' condition. --Lvova 20:15, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment Agree with Michael, picture would look better with the lower 1/3 cropped off. But I also get Lvova's point. --Plozessor 05:45, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good to me. Yes it is an image about a road, but still ok to me. --Sebring12Hrs 15:32, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Per Sebring12Hrs--Lmbuga 10:28, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Sebring12Hrs 15:32, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Siuri_Damodar_Temple_01.jpg

• Nomination Siuri Damodar Temple. --Sumitsurai 04:21, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• Looks tilted --Poco a poco 06:40, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Gower 15:02, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• As far as @Gower: promoted it without respect to a prevoius comment, I sent in to CR without a voice against. --Lvova 20:34, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Looks good as it is, concluding from the background it also seems straight. --Plozessor 05:47, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 10:25, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Lvova 18:42, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Петергоф,_Нижний_парк,_Оранжерейный_сад,_розы_05.jpg

• Nomination Roses in Orangery Garden of Lower Park, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:20, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Image quality: not very detailed. --Gower 17:18, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Detailed enough. --Lvova 20:16, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Added implicit support --Plozessor 05:48, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per Gower. --Plozessor 05:47, 12 October 2025 (UTC)~
•  Oppose Sorry, but flowers in the foreground seems to be out of focus --Jakubhal 09:14, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but I see processing problem here, there are digital artifacts around high contrast edges. LexKurochkin 13:39, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment I didn't process this photo at all, just cropped. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 15:45, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• Weak  Support, not perfect, but the red tones look reasonably natural, which is not often the case. --Smial 14:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --Lvova 18:26, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

File:30.09.25_in_Litochoro_17.jpg

• Nomination Olympus from Litochoro --Lvova 09:38, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• Promotion
   Support Good quality. --Romzig 09:25, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose The mod of the sunset picture was destroyed with the not well made foreground shadow lift (see leaves on the upper left of the picture). An crop to 1:1 would also help the motive, i.e. skip the forground. --2015 Michael 2015 10:48, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Samrtphone picture, but very good sharpness and lights. --Sebring12Hrs 10:32, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Sebring12Hrs 18:12, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Katerini_city_09.jpg

• Nomination A manhole cover in Katerini --Lvova 09:38, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Low detail due to low resolution, I don't see any mitigating reason why it is so small --Poco a poco 22:19, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support The sharpness is very good. I can't see any reason to decline. --Sebring12Hrs 17:21, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• For people with Canon EOS 5DS R Красный today explained already about the need in crop not to distort the shape. Maximum here is 4096 × 3072 (photos.app.goo.gl/WnkePqiTgrUc3H6W6). Lvova 20:29, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

• No idea why pictures from an EOS 5DS R would need to be cropped, but this picture here was taken with a OnePlus 13. --Plozessor 05:50, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

• An owner of EOS 5DS R writes that he doesn't see any mitigating reason, so I'm explaining (and fixed a typo). Lvova 07:45, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support The image has more than 7.5 mpx so it meets QI criteria, and it's sharp enough to be QI. -- Екатерина Борисова 15:55, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support good quality, I have no objections--Gower 19:54, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Gower 19:57, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Meursault_-_Église_Saint-Nicolas_-_3.jpg

• Nomination Meursault (Côte-d'Or, France) - Saint Nicholas church --Benjism89 05:48, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:04, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not so sharp, especially building on the left. --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment Gower set this back to nomination after a vote had already been made for promotion ; I assume he wanted to oppose, so I'm taking it to CR as I believe this is sharp. @Gower: please do not set back to nomination once a Promotion or Decline vote has been made, use Discuss if you wish to challenge an existing vote --Benjism89 10:23, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Sharp enough (and very good otherwise). --Plozessor 05:51, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Very good image ! --Sebring12Hrs 10:30, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Sharp enough --Jakubhal 11:09, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Very good and sharp, I probably looked at another picture, my mistake, sorry for mess. --Gower 20:03, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Weak support The spire and the flowers at the bottom are not sharp enough, but as a whole it's over the QI bar IMO. -- Екатерина Борисова 22:10, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Gower 20:03, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2025_Poznań,_Kościół_św._Franciszka_Serafickiego_w_Poznaniu.jpg

• Nomination 2025 Poznań, Kościół św. Franciszka Serafickiego w Poznaniu --Igor123121 04:22, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• There is something wrong with the cloud on the right --Uoaei1 05:18, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• @Uoaei1:  Done --Igor123121 05:35, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

• Whatever you have done, this has negative impact on the adjacent building --Uoaei1 06:31, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• @Uoaei1:  Done? --Igor123121 13:38, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Ok now --Uoaei1 14:26, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose The sky is posterized/pixelated, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs 21:19, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Sebring12Hrs, strange effects in the sky (apparently different levels or types of noise reduction in different areas), also the doors and windows are too dark. --Plozessor 05:54, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• @Sebring12Hrs: @Plozessor: I have performed a JPEG artifact removal operation - I kindly ask for a reassessment. Igor123121 13:53, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

• Now there's CA everywhere (purple halos at the church tower and walls and elsewhere), and the doors and windows are still too dark, if not even pitch black. --Plozessor 15:08, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment also probably too high contrast caused dark areas clipped.--Gower 08:34, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Lvova 18:25, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Mercedes-Benz_C174_350_4Matic_IAA_2025_DSC_2108.jpg

• Nomination Mercedes-Benz C174 350 4Matic at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 10:26, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Not sharp enough --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

• In my opinion, the car is sharp. Please discuss. --Alexander-93 09:08, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Sharp and also otherwise good. Grey car on grey street isn't optimal, but streets are grey, what can we do. --Plozessor 05:55, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Ok. --Sebring12Hrs 10:29, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Sebring12Hrs 10:29, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

File:1002_Arc_de_Triomphe_in_Paris_at_night_Photo_by_Giles_Laurent.jpg

• Nomination Arc de Triomphe in Paris at night --Giles Laurent 10:23, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose This perspective is not acceptable to me. --Sebring12Hrs 10:58, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

  Thank you for your review but I respectfully disagree. It's a real life perspective just as you see it with the human eye. Perspective corrected edits make the monument look unatural in my eyes and I would like to keep it natural. Moreover, this natural perspective enhances the height and majesty of the monument in my opinion. -- Giles Laurent 21:36, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Strong perspective corrections (as would be needed here) create images that, regardless of the quality of the photographer or processor, never look completely natural. I believe that in such cases, both PCed and non-PCed pictures are acceptable for QI, as long as the result isn't too unnatural. Very good picture otherwise. --Benjism89 16:34, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment I didn't pay attention to the sharpness, but yes it's very good. --Sebring12Hrs 17:15, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, per Sebring12Hrs here. The perspective isn't convincing. --Milseburg 19:04, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• Very good image but PC strongly needed here. Would be FP then Юрий Д.К. 03:25, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Perspective doesn't work for me, probably it could work if the square would be cropped off. IMO the intention of giving the impression of a viewer looking up and 'enhancing the height and majesty of the monument' doesn't work if the monument doesn't start near the bottom edge. --Plozessor 15:13, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Plozessor.--Gower 08:33, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --Gower 08:33, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

File:1003_Arc_de_Triomphe_in_Paris_at_night_long_exposure_Photo_by_Giles_Laurent.jpg

• Nomination Arc de Triomphe in Paris at night long exposure --Giles Laurent 10:23, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose This perspective is not acceptable to me. --Sebring12Hrs 10:58, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

  Thank you for your review but I respectfully disagree. It's a real life perspective just as you see it with the human eye. Perspective corrected edits make the monument look unatural in my eyes and I would like to keep it natural. Moreover, this natural perspective enhances the height and majesty of the monument in my opinion. -- Giles Laurent 21:36, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment Same opinion as above but the item at the bottom right corner should be removed or cropped out. --Benjism89 16:35, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, per Sebring12Hrs here. The perspective isn't convincing.--Milseburg 19:05, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• Very good image but PC strongly needed here. Would be FP then Юрий Д.К. 03:26, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose same opinion as Юрий Д.К.--Gower 08:32, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Gower 08:32, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

File:1014_Pont_du_Gard_Photo_by_Giles_Laurent.jpg

• Nomination Aerial view of Pont du Gard, France --Giles Laurent 10:23, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Argenberg 10:45, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

  Was not marked, but definitely a support voice. Lvova 08:24, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose Overprocessed. --Sebring12Hrs 11:03, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

  Thank you for your review Sebring12Hrs but I respectfully disagree. It's a very high resolution shot that was taken with a drone as it's the only way to achieve this. Compare it with this downsized version to see that sharpness in the given conditions is more than acceptable for QI imo -- Giles Laurent 21:33, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose At full and even medium size, the textures in this picture look really strange and suggest overprocessing (which might be caused by the drone). --Benjism89 16:38, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Some level of processing and noise reduction is acceptable in difficult conditions - but this picture is way off, the overprocessing is extreme. Was 1/2000s necessary? --Plozessor 06:03, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others --Jakubhal 09:15, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Sebring12Hrs 18:11, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

File:1016_Château_de_la_Napoule_at_sunset_Photo_by_Giles_Laurent.jpg

• Nomination Château de la Napoule at sunset, France --Giles Laurent 10:23, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Overprocessed. --Sebring12Hrs 11:01, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

  Thank you for your review but I respectfully disagree. It's a very high resolution shot that was taken in low light conditions with a drone as it's the only way to achieve this. Compare it with this downsized version to see that sharpness in the given conditions is more than acceptable for QI imo -- Giles Laurent 21:29, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose At full and even medium size, the textures in this picture look really strange and suggest overprocessing (which might be caused by the drone). --Benjism89 16:38, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Same as the picture above, extremely overprocessed. --Plozessor 06:04, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose nice landscape, but high loss of detail. --Gower 08:30, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --Gower 08:30, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Meursault_-_Château-fort_-_2.jpg

• Nomination Meursault (Côte-d'Or, France) - Old castle (now hosting the town hall) --Benjism89 06:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• This needs perspective correction. Could this be done? --AFBorchert 10:09, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support It doesn't need any PC, but may be is a bit blurred at full size, ok at 2 560 × 2 048 pixels. --Sebring12Hrs 11:29, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Agree with AFBorchert, it is distorted. And yes, not sharp. --Lvova 18:02, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment I corrected a bit the aspect ratio, hopefully it looks more natural now. --Benjism89 16:30, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sharpness below QI standards, especially at the edges. Probably lens effect combined with too high ISO (don't know the exact behavior of that camera/lens combination, but f/13 seems too high). --Plozessor 06:07, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Plozessor 06:07, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Barbudo_cabecirrojo_(Trachyphonus_erythrocephalus),_parque_nacional_de_Tarangire,_Tanzania,_2024-05-25,_DD_79.jpg

• Nomination Red-and-yellow barbet (Trachyphonus erythrocephalus), Serengeti Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 06:37, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 06:59, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose The eyes are out of focus, which is important for animal photography. --Lvova 18:06, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality --Jakubhal 08:04, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Over the bar. --Plozessor 06:08, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Imho the eye is in focus. Little red and blue chromatic aberration to fix. --Gower 08:29, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Gower 08:29, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Barbudo_cabecirrojo_(Trachyphonus_erythrocephalus),_parque_nacional_de_Tarangire,_Tanzania,_2024-05-25,_DD_82.jpg

• Nomination Red-and-yellow barbet (Trachyphonus erythrocephalus), Serengeti Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 06:37, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 06:59, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Noisy. --Lvova 18:06, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

  Nonsense. Do you actually care about the offered res? what noise would I see in your 12 MPx shots if you upscale them to the res I offer? --Poco a poco 22:01, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

  I already told for several times that I am not downscaling, so if you don't see noise in the maximal resolution - there is no a version with the noise. Nonsense is your reaction. You are pushing images with such words against everyone who say that you're not ideal. Lvova 08:21, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

  There is very little noise here, almost invisible at 2048x2048. And Lvova, no matter whether you do downscale or not some of your pictures, what's important here is that a 5000x5000 picture will never be as sharp and noiseless as the same picture at 2000x2000. You should compare sharpness and noise between pictures at the same resolution - otherwise, nominators here will indeed be enticed to downscale their pictures. --Benjism89 10:36, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

  The background is mostly okay, but the chest and back, especially at the border with the background, in my opinion are not ok. And it's possible to make QI in high resolution (and Poco a poco regularly does), so I don't think this idea fit the rules. Lvova 20:48, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

  Thank you for your comment, Benjism89, that's what I tried to explain. Lvova I was wondering how would your image look if you UPscale it to 50 MPx. Poco a poco 17:37, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

  let's downscale by themselves or they will downscale... No, we should not. My turn to say thanks to Plozessor. Lvova 18:10, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality --Jakubhal 08:05, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support While I do not agree that high resolution would necessarily come with noise, this picture is over the bar for me. --Plozessor 06:39, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

• Well, I don't have to agree, I know that. When I moved from the a 21 MPx to a 50 MPx camera I realized that along with an increase of detail in the areas I intended, lens issues like noise and CA were obviously amplified by the higher resolution. Poco a poco 17:37, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
• @Poco a poco: I think we're both correct and talking about different aspects. More pixels on same sensor size = higher noise. If you switch from a 20 MP APS-C sensor to a 50 MP APS-C sensor, yes, sensor noise will be higher. But Benjism89 actually said that 'a 5000x5000 picture' would 'never be ... sharp and noiseless', and that I disagree with - of course there are cameras that can produce a "sharp and noiseless" 25 MP picture at low ISO. --Plozessor 04:15, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

• I made a small technical edit to the vote above. Please don’t use the equals sign without a nowiki, as it apparently breaks the template :) -- Jakubhal 05:10, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• @Plozessor: I wrote "a 5000x5000 picture will never be as sharp and noiseless as the same picture at 2000x2000". Of course, in good light conditions, a 25 MP picture can be very sharp and noiseless, we do agree on that, but it will not be as sharp and noiseless as the same picture, taken in the same lighting conditions with the same camera. --Benjism89 05:58, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Plozessor (talk)

File:Barbudo_cabecirrojo_(Trachyphonus_erythrocephalus),_parque_nacional_de_Tarangire,_Tanzania,_2024-05-25,_DD_83.jpg

• Nomination Red-and-yellow barbet (Trachyphonus erythrocephalus), Serengeti Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 06:37, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Magnificent bird, but not very sharp head and its eye unfortunately. --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

  I applied some sharpening, this pic deserves the QI stamp --Poco a poco 21:50, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose Disagree here, only the belly is sharp, the head, eyes and beak are not. --Plozessor 06:41, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but per Plozessor Jakubhal 09:16, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Sebring12Hrs 18:10, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Kazan_Voronkov_—_Kalyagin_House_Detail_2024-07-14_1665.jpg

• Nomination Kazan Voronkov — Kalyagin House Detail --Mike1979 Russia 06:36, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Gower 08:48, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too soft, sorry. --Lvova 18:07, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Lvova. It seems the focus failed. --Sebring12Hrs 17:12, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Indeed, blurry/oof. --Plozessor 06:41, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose blurry indeed, I wasn't focused on in enough. --Gower 08:26, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --Gower 08:26, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2025,_Kraków,_Kościół_Najświętszego_Serca_Pana_Jezusa,_ul._Kopernika_(12).jpg

• Nomination 2025, Kraków, Kościół Najświętszego Serca Pana Jezusa, ul. Kopernika --Igor123121 05:10, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion Overexposed on the floor --Jacek Halicki 06:24, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Blur --Dev Jadiya 06:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

  @Jacek Halicki:  Done --Igor123121 14:06, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose Sorry, it is a bit better, but still there are huge overexposed areas on the floor. I don't think it is fixable here --Jakubhal 08:07, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others, burnt out part is too big. Unless there is data in the raw file and you could fix the floor, you could crop the lower half away (or make another version). --Plozessor 06:43, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment Nice interior image, maybe to fix or crop? --Gower 20:16, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Plozessor 06:43, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Demi_Vollering_-_2025_European_road_championship_podium_-_Guilherand-Granges.jpg

• Nomination Demi Vollering vainqueure de la course en ligne des championnats d'Europe 2025 à Guilherand-Granges.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :La réalisation de ce document a été parrainée par Wikimédia France. (Proposez un projet !). By User:Kakoula10 --Shougissime 18:56, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• Nice, but not very sharp face. --Gower 19:03, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Hm... the focus is apparently on the tasty gold medal. Nonetheless, I still think that this is good enough for QI. --AFBorchert 20:16, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• But a bit noisy and for a portrait it's bad that the focus is not on eyes. It is NOT an oppose voice, but I would like to read more opinions. --Lvova 09:42, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too noisy in subject's face to be QI in my opinion. --E bailey 15:31, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose as E bailey --Gower 20:19, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Over the bar for me. --Plozessor 06:44, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Plozessor 06:44, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Avestruz_(Struthio_camelus),_zona_de_conservación_de_Ngorongoro,_Tanzania,_2024-05-27,_DD_33.jpg

• Nomination Common ostrich (Struthio camelus), Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:14, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Subject not in focus. --E bailey 14:37, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Ostrich not very sharp. --Gower 17:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

  Sorry guys, this reviews are not fine. It's a wild shot taken with a 600mm lens, I still applied more sharpness, QI to me if I know what this is about --Poco a poco 22:30, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

  But the fact about hardness of photoshooting is unrelated to sharpness, in my opinion you also often nominate pictures that are unsharp - I stopped to comment because of your reaction. This photo has problems with the colors of the neck now. Lvova 08:14, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

  True, there was some color noise, I removed it Poco a poco 17:44, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

   Weak support now. Lvova 18:01, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

  I’ll add this right away. These pages often mention that there are conditions in which QI cannot be achieved - for example, specific museum conditions or photos of buildings on very narrow streets. This is just a given, which doesn’t mean the photos are bad or useless; they simply don’t fit the QI criteria. But for some reason, you think that outside the rules, we should make an exception for wildlife shots taken with a telephoto lens; traditionally, this often works, especially since you can reference the fact that many of your images have been accepted under this approach.

  Additionally, you refer to the equipment of the people evaluating your work. Indeed, my camera has far more technical limitations than yours; there are situations where it’s pointless for me to shoot even for illustrative purposes, without aiming for QI. However, I’m getting better at understanding these conditions and limitations and achieving results without trying to say, "Come on, look at how tough the conditions were for a phone camera". Your equipment has fewer limitations, but there are still some. Don’t rely on authority instead of simply accepting its limitations. Lvova 09:21, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

  I don't understand what you try to elaborate, sorry. There are always limitations, but nobody can expect the same sharpness (which isn't impossible but unlikely) of a manhole vs shy wild life for which you need a strong tele, specially when reviewers pixelpee 50 Mpx images. Poco a poco 17:44, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

  I try to say that I don't like ideas like '48mp cannot be not ideal'. It still can be sharp enough or not. You're good at processing, not only in photoshooting, so after 2 fixes it is QI, but I dislike what you regularly say when see an oppose voice (like here). Lvova 18:01, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

  This community has a high standard for bird photography. Especially when the bird is still, it should be sharp. Here are some recent examples of declined QI images of birds: heron, loon, ostrich, and flamingo --E bailey 22:09, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support I don't see any problem with sharpness here. It the eye is out of focus, then it's by no more than a few centimeters ... --Benjism89 16:47, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Question Why are the neck and right part of the back so hazy, compared to the rest? --Plozessor 06:51, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Lvova 18:01, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Avestruz_(Struthio_camelus),_zona_de_conservación_de_Ngorongoro,_Tanzania,_2024-05-27,_DD_42.jpg

• Nomination Common ostrich (Struthio camelus), Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:14, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose Nice view, but ostrich isn't very sharp --Gower 17:49, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

  Not required in my opinion, but still I applied more sharpness --Poco a poco 22:34, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good now. Lvova 08:11, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Ok --Jakubhal 18:05, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:49, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

File:20225,_Kraków,_Cmentarz_Rakowicki_w_Krakowie,_1.jpg

• Nomination 2025, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki w Krakowie --Igor123121 05:18, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Tilted, chromatic aberration, overexposed or burned out highlights on mausoleum --Gower 19:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

  @Gower:  Done --Igor123121 17:17, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose the first version has CAs, but the last is downscaled ! Why ? --Sebring12Hrs 17:08, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• @Sebring12Hrs: Why not? Is it prohibited? Igor123121 20:44, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

   Comment I can see overall purple CAs on the trees, and yes it is a bit overexposed. But sharpness is good enough. --Sebring12Hrs 17:10, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

• @Igor123121: About downsizing - yes, it is the first point in the Image guidelines: Images should not be downsampled (sized down). It’s not prohibited on Commons, but it’s a perfectly valid reason to reject your photos here. Jakubhal 06:04, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose First version wasn't blurry, so I don't even see any reason for the downscaling. All versions are a bit overcontrasted. Unfortunately we don't have the camera model in EXIF data, so I don't know whether this was taken with a proper camera so that it could easily be fixed with better raw conversion, or it is a smartphone picture where options are limited. --Plozessor 06:54, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Plozessor 06:54, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Rinoceronte_negro_(Diceros_bicornis),_parque_nacional_del_lago_Nakuru,_Kenia,_2024-05-18,_DD_75.jpg

• Nomination Black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis), Lake Nakuru National Park, Kenya --Poco a poco 04:25, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Not sharp enough --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

  I would like to discuss this one --Poco a poco 06:58, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Borderline resolution but ok. --Plozessor 06:55, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose been downsampled to 2.3MP and subject is still not that sharp. Not QI in my opinion. Guidelines explicity mention "Images should not be downsampled (sized down) in order to appear of better quality" --E bailey 20:51, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Plozessor 06:55, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Apatura ilia male lateral Bytom.jpg

• Nomination Apatura ilia male, lateral view. --Gower 17:43, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose May be a bit too much color noise. --Sebring12Hrs 18:04, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support QI to me --Cvmontuy 01:18, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Sebring12Hrs. Lvova 09:45, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

   Support Not ideal, but it is QI. Lvova 20:42, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

• Would support if noise will be reduced. Юрий Д.К. 02:01, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  •  Weak support Юрий Д.К. 03:28, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

  @Sebring12Hrs, Юрий Д.К., and Lvova: thanks for your attention,  Done, colour noise reduced, please check it now -- Gower 20:25, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Not perfect, but over the bar for me. --Plozessor 06:56, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Wow, good now. --Sebring12Hrs 10:26, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Sebring12Hrs 18:08, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2025,_Kraków,_Cmentarz_Rakowicki_(1040).jpg

• Nomination 2025, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki --Igor123121 13:29, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Totally random angle of view. Why? Lighting and sky also not favorable. --Gower 17:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

• Lack of concrete arguments – the comment is just mere rumination. If there is something to improve, I encourage you to formulate specific objections instead of ruminating that it could have been done better. --Igor123121 19:18, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose The review above is perfectly okay. There is lots of chroma noise in this image, the sky has striations and the composition and perspective are also haphazard and imbalanced. --Peulle 08:57, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Random angle/composition, tilted, CA, improper white balance, dark subject in front of bright, burnt-out sky. --Plozessor 06:57, 12 October 2025 (UTC)~
•  Oppose Unfavorable lightning with the subject in the shadow. Also, a probable perspective distortion - the plaque in the foreground (bottom left) should not be trapezoidal, I guess --Jakubhal 09:22, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:40, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Traben_Trarbach,_de_Brückentor_Dm_IMG_4875_2024-08-27_12.00.jpg

• Nomination Traben Trarbach in Germnay-RP, town gate: the Brückentor --Michielverbeek 05:15, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:48, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose not sharp enough --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Ok for me --Uoaei1 07:42, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too soft and a little bit distorted. Lvova 09:47, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good to me. Above the QI bar. --Sebring12Hrs 10:10, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support IMO good enough. --XRay 11:19, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support --Milseburg 18:58, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support good enough, nice composed -- Gower 20:28, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Weak support I would crop out the shadow at the bottom edge, but good enough --Jakubhal 09:23, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Total: 7 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Sebring12Hrs 09:47, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Traben-Trarbach,_het_Spitzhaus_Dm_met_kerk_toren_IMG_4888_2024-08-27_13.10.jpg

• Nomination Traben-Trarbach in Germany-RP, monumental house (the Spitzhaus) with churchtower --Michielverbeek 05:15, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose Overprocessed --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support QI for me. --Uoaei1 06:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. Ok to me. --Sebring12Hrs 12:53, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support IMO good enough. --XRay 11:18, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Dev Jadiya, the road and center wall has no detail --Cvmontuy 12:02, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality, there are actually details on the road and center wall at full scale, I just believe they are very clean --Benjism89 10:39, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support --Milseburg 18:57, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Sebring12Hrs 06:42, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Poplar_farming_Casale_sul_Sile_3.jpg

• Nomination Poplar fields near Casale sul Sile --Kallerna 04:49, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Gower 05:48, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:50, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Blur --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too soft. Lvova 09:49, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Weak support Юрий Д.К. 03:32, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but only the small part in the middle is sharp enough --Jakubhal 16:37, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → More votes?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:42, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Soccer_goal_at_the_beach_boulevard_of_Toroni.jpg

• Nomination Soccer goal at the beach boulevard of Toroni --Kritzolina 17:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Vsatinet 08:02, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Lacks sharpness. Sorry. --Ermell 09:06, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ermell.--Peulle 08:59, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support IMO ok. --Sebring12Hrs 10:24, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Sebring12Hrs 10:24, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Norderney,_Strand_--_2025_--_8975.jpg

• Nomination Sea foam washed up on the beach, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:18, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Blurred --Dev Jadiya 07:32, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support I suppose that this blur is intentional :) Maybe it's worth another discussion, maybe not, but I won't like this photo to be declined for not very convincing reasons. --Екатерина Борисова 23:31, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

• I assume a support vote. --XRay 05:56, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• You're right. The blurring is intentional. You're absolutely right. In my opinion, a photo like this wouldn't work if too much of it were in focus. After all, the aperture is f/7.1, which provides sufficient sharpness. With a significantly larger aperture (f/2, for example), there would be even less sharpness, but the overall sharpness would also decrease significantly. (We remember the critical aperture. Unfortunately, this page only exists in the German Wikipedia.) --XRay 05:54, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support high quality image with a slightly unusual but very effective focus --Kritzolina 08:15, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Юрий Д.К. 18:22, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose The technical quality, read: technical-optical implementation of this shot, is certainly at QI level. But the artistic realization is, IMHO, somewhat lacking. I feel like the choice of placement of the area of sharpness is too bad to cast a supporting vote. The claim is to have taken a depiction of foam washed up on a (sand) beach. But the area to look at sharp foam is too small, amounting to "a few bubbles". You've got an apparent L shape of foam, looking along the long leg of the letter. I would have preferred to see sharp foam from around where the long and the short stroke of the L shape meet - that's where the bokeh is already noticeable in the preview. You maybe should have placed the DOF one or two palms farther away from where it sits on the candidate? Otherwise, the claim of a foam depiction is not truly fitting - I even somewhat wonder what subject could be illustrated with this image... On the other hand, the light refraction and rainbow effects are nice actual highlights. Regards, --Grand-Duc 18:42, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

• Sorry, but I don't understand how this photo can be considered “artistic.” Your explanations are very detailed, thank you for that, but the use of photographic effects may be creative, but it is certainly not artistic. Here at Commons, there is a wide variety of photos, including those with bokeh. (Incidentally, an article on bokeh in Wikipedia or another project could also be illustrated with such a photo. But we shouldn't limit ourselves to Wikipedia.) A photo with a large depth of field is not always appropriate. --XRay 07:41, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

In Ordnung, dann gerne auf Deutsch - ich hatte mich etwas schwergetan, alles treffend auf Englisch auszudrücken. Ich hadere damit, dass der Schärfebereich in meinen Augen nicht auf das geeignetste Areal gelegt wurde, sondern etwa 1-2 Handbreit davor. Um das Motif "Angespülten Schaum am Strand" abzubilden, hätte mehr Schaum gezeigt werden müssen, finde ich (dahin, wo die Schaumhaufen zum rechten Bildrand zeigen). So sehe ich ein Foto, dass einen deutlichen Schärfeverlauf hat, aus einer Unschärfe in die Schärfe und wieder in die Unschärfe - die technische Umsetzung ist gut, eine durchgehende Schärfe wäre langweilig. Nur ist dieses sinnvolle Gestaltungsmittel meiner Meinung nach wie gesagt suboptimal eingesetzt worden! Das ist so, als würde ein guter Bordeaux-Wein für eine Gulaschsoße, echter Wasabi für Discounter-Zuchtlachs oder ein Obsidian-Skalpell für Papierbasteleien verwendet werden. Ich meine: Das Werkzeug funktioniert, aber das Resultat bleibt unter den theoretischen Möglichkeiten. Hättest Du die Schärfe anders gelegt, wäre das Bild in meinen Augen vielleicht sogar ein aussichtsreicher Kandidat für KEB (in der DE-WP) oder FPC gewesen. Konnte ich meine Beurteilung nun besser ausdrücken? Grüße, Grand-Duc (talk) 13:42, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Ja, auf jeden Fall. Vielen Dank für deine Ausführungen. Ich muss zugeben, dass ich mich bezüglich der Wahl, was scharf abgebildet werden soll, schon recht schwer getan habe. --XRay 14:18, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support I don't have to understand it to enjoy it. --Cvmontuy 16:16, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Per Екатерина Борисова and Kritzolina LexKurochkin 15:50, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --LexKurochkin 15:50, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Die_Marksburg_im_Winter.jpg

• Nomination Marksburg im Winter -- Rolf Kranz 13:17, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Support What a sight! --Harmonide 13:35, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Quite nice, but a bit 'plastic' look of castle surface. Weird white halo around spires. --Gower 13:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• @Gower: done.Thanks for your reviews. ---- Rolf Kranz 21:33, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

@Rolf Kranz: nice view, but oversharpened and 'hieroglyphic' artifacts are still clearly visible on walls. --Gower 08:21, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Would support this as FP candidate --Uoaei1 06:33, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support The latest version is much better. Obvious QI for me --Jakubhal 07:03, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Very good -- Spurzem 11:40, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support per Uoaei1 --Milseburg 18:55, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overprocessed to me. Sorry. --Sebring12Hrs 18:12, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --Sebring12Hrs 18:12, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Osthafenbrunnen,_Frankfurt_am_Main_(P1032648).jpg

• Nomination Osthafenbrunnen in Frankfurt-Ostend --MB-one 10:24, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose A closer look would be better for me. --Harmonide 13:13, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• I disagree. A full view of the object, is not a valid reason to decline. --MB-one 13:29, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support There is no need to choose between this foreshortening and theoretical another one. Good quality. --Lvova 15:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Neutral It's such a shame. There are exciting subjects, but cars are parked everywhere. This has become a disruptive factor for many subjects. I'm not judging this negatively, because I don't see any other way to capture the subject. But in terms of image composition, the many objects in the background are distracting. This makes the image appear restless. --XRay 11:17, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Neutral per XRay. Object is blending with the background. Maybe different lens and wider aperture could help. --Gower 08:19, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Peulle 06:46, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:CEEM_2025,_Второй_день_(27).jpg

• Nomination Amir Sarabadani. Second day of Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2025. --Красный 08:59, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Comment Could be croped above. --PetarM 10:36, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• @Harmonide: Please, do not promote images with unanswered/unresolved comments. Per PetarM --Jakubhal 16:43, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• @Jakubhal I did promote. Forgot to put s. --PetarM 17:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose Well, I still have issues with this photo. Awkward bottom framing with most of the arms, but with cut-off hands is one. There are also some green CA on the blouse --Jakubhal 18:03, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Jakubhal. Composition (background and cropping) isn't very fortunate. --Gower 08:16, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Gower 08:16, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Scholari_11.jpg

• Nomination Scholari --Lvova 08:25, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support OK. --Harmonide 13:35, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Large unfavorable shadow in the foreground --Gower 13:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• I don't think it was a problem, but it also wasn't smth too important, so cropped. --Lvova 15:35, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support The image would be acceptable in first version IMO, but this version is better --Jakubhal 04:24, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support --Kritzolina 08:18, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support after cropping it's very nice --Gower 08:14, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

  Please don't forget to cancel your "decline" vote. --Sebring12Hrs 15:34, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Gower 08:14, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Cráter_volcánico,_zona_de_conservación_de_Ngorongoro,_Tanzania,_2024-05-27,_DD_11.jpg

• Nomination Volcanic crater, Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 10:02, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 10:08, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Seems quite blurry to me, sorry. --Harmonide 13:35, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Ok imho Юрий Д.К. 18:24, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Harmonide. High clipping in shadows too. --Gower 08:13, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --Gower 08:13, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Mahashivaratri_Varanasi_2025._56.jpg

• Nomination Shiva attire captured at Varanasi --I.Mahesh 04:16, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:41, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Impressive. --Harmonide 16:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose The same as above: impressive, yes, but technically not good. --Lvova 16:51, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unsharp, noise --Jakubhal 16:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Very good image though the nose is not very sharp if I see it more than life-size -- Spurzem 12:28, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose per other opposers --Uoaei1 13:43, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Absolutely not sharp and overprocessed.... --Sebring12Hrs 14:27, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Given the resolution I think that the sharpness is not thaaat bad, but the focus should be on the nose --Poco a poco 17:49, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Sebring12Hrs 18:01, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

File:People_on_the_Learning_day_of_CEEM_2025,_05.jpg

• Nomination Helga Vranos (Κommissarische Leiterin der Bibliothek) during the Learning day of CEEM 2025 --Lvova 07:08, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. Please add a {{Personality rights}} template to the file description. --AFBorchert 10:12, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• The bookshelf is tilted, it can be fixed. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Done Check now. --Lvova 16:42, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Now it's ok :) -- Gower 20:34, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:39, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Hermeskeil,_katholische_Pfarrkirche_Sankt_Martin_Dm_IMG_4776_2024-08-25_18.14.jpg

• Nomination Hermeskeil in Germany-RP, catolic church: Pfarrkirche Sankt Martin --Michielverbeek 05:06, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality, but not very sharp (top of the tower) --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose A little bit distorted, a little bit unsharp, a little bit noisy. --Lvova 10:07, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Magnificent building, but the top of it and the left side of the image are too unsharp, and also shadows are too dark. Sorry. -- Екатерина Борисова 23:13, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:40, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Santa_Maria_del_Carmine,_Milan.jpg

• Nomination The Church of Santa Maria del Carmine, Milan --Julian Lupyan 23:33, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 11:23, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

• @Lmbuga Would you mind clarifying what PC stands for? I could not find it in Commons:Photography terms --Julian Lupyan 13:08, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

• perspective correction. Lvova 14:54, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
• @Julian Lupyan: , I will reply on your discussion page.--Lmbuga 11:54, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Done @Sebring12Hrs: PC done + sharpened. Please let me know if I should change anything further --Julian Lupyan 22:41, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• I think it has a chance in CR as far as the quthor tries to fix problems. --Lvova 10:00, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment Perspective is good, but some areas are blurred, this is not very sharp IMO. --Sebring12Hrs 20:02, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• @Sebring12Hrs: @Lvova: Sharpened a little bit more, I cannot sharpen any further. If it still isn't sharp enough I understand --Julian Lupyan 23:26, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose clipped highlights on the sky and shadows partially --Gower 08:06, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Gower 08:06, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Chatham_Cenotaph,_Chatham,_Ontario,_2025-07-06_03.jpg

• Nomination Chatham Cenotaph, Chatham, Ontario, 2025-07-06 --Crisco 1492 14:18, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Comment Nice photo, but I see what looks like a speck of dust near the sculpture's right elbow. --Vsatinet 14:52, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality, no doubt. --Harmonide 00:46, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Until an answer to the question about that dot. --Lvova 09:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 07:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Harbour,_Ribnitz-Damgarten_(LRM_20240511_132516).jpg

• Nomination Sailboats in the harbour of Ribnitz --MB-one 21:43, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose The Sky is really noisy. --Syntaxys 02:31, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Harmonide 00:46, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Syntaxys. --Lvova 09:48, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment I think a slight PC is needed too. --Sebring12Hrs 14:35, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:42, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Bazylika_Narodzenia_Najświętszej_Maryi_Panny_w_Gietrzwałdzie,_2025,_KsP_007.jpg

• Nomination Gietrzwałd, Bazylika Narodzenia Najświętszej Maryi Panny w GietrzwałdzieJa, właściciel praw autorskich do tego dzieła, udostępniam je na poniższej licencjiTa fotografia została przesłana w ramach projektu Wiki Lubi Zabytki będącego częścią inicjatywy Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --KrzysztofPoplawski 17:12, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
• Decline
• PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 00:23, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

• PC  Done --KrzysztofPoplawski 07:36, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 10:06, 6 October 2025 (UTC) Support vote stricken after image was not fixed for several days now, see below. --AFBorchert 14:51, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Purple CAs at left on the tree trunks. --Sebring12Hrs 17:11, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• You are right, I overlooked that. @KrzysztofPoplawski: could you fix the CAs? --AFBorchert 09:29, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:43, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

File:20250502_Vienna_02.jpg

• Nomination View up the courtyard of the Paltisches Haus at the Himmelpfortgasse 15 in Vienna, Austria --FlocciNivis 16:03, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• pls remove those dust specks --Virtual-Pano 17:20, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Done --FlocciNivis 14:32, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment there are still two spots just to the right of the centre Virtual-Pano 20:24, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Done, did I get all of them this time? Otherwise I'll give up... --FlocciNivis 17:30, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Interesting perspective and nice blue. --Harmonide 00:32, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Dust spots on the walls. --Sebring12Hrs 17:08, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose if dust spots on the walls will be eliminated I can support it. --Gower 08:03, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Gower 08:03, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

File:V-P_08618_GER_Muenster_Lamberti_church_with_Himmelsleiter_seen_from_Prinzipalmarkt.jpg

• Nomination Prinzipalmarkt and St Lamberti with light installation 'Himmelsleiter' --Virtual-Pano 08:06, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• Please remove the white line at the top edge and the sky is a bit noisy, other ok. --Sebring12Hrs 19:52, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Done thx - for the hint Virtual-Pano 23:12, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

• Ok for the white line, but the sky is posterized now. Sorry. --Sebring12Hrs 22:11, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Interesting shot. Almost magical. --Harmonide 00:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Don't cancel my vote. --Sebring12Hrs 17:05, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose nice shot, now I am against, but I can change my mind if compression artifacts on the sky (clearly visible 'squares' and posterization around tower) will be eliminated--Gower 08:02, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Gower 08:01, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2025,_Kraków,_Ulica_Mikołajska_14_(2).jpg

• Nomination 2025, Kraków, Ulica Mikołajska 14 (2) --Igor123121 16:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:08, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice photo, but parallel to window, frontal perspective would be better. --Gower 17:46, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

• @Gower: I’m aware of that, but I’d rather not change the perspective so drastically in the program, as it would distort the natural look of the photo. I think that although it’s not perfect in its current form, it still meets the requirements of Quality images. --Igor123121 18:06, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• It was just a comment, now formatted as an implicit oppose by Peulle, who forgets to make such notes. Lvova 10:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:21, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with Gower. Something is off for me. -- Harmonide 13:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• A photo can always be better, though in my opinion this one is sufficient for QI. I don’t intend to change the perspective in the program because it would distort the image too much. Igor123121 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Lvova 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:NW_Night_Roma_Tiburtina_Italy_Sep23_A7C_07958.jpg

• Nomination Roma Tiburtina Station at night, view from northwest, Italy --Tagooty 04:11, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:37, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Color noise, PC not done and not very sharp. --Sebring12Hrs 20:37, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

  @Sebring12Hrs: Thanks for the review. Please see the new version with PC and NR. --Tagooty 03:09, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support I find it quite remarkable, indeed. -- Harmonide 13:17, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose sorry, but I agree with Sebring12Hrs even for the new version. Lvova 14:42, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment nice, but probably too high noise reduction caused lack of detail in textures --Gower 07:57, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Lvova 14:42, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:UlicaPapierniPrądnickich-TorowiskoTramwajowe-PrądnikBiały-POL,_Kraków.jpg

• Nomination UlicaPapierniPrądnickich-TorowiskoTramwajowe-PrądnikBiały-POL, Kraków --Igor123121 05:11, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 07:11, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Perspective distortion should be fixed --Jakubhal 07:18, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Jakubhal, and there are dust spots and the sky is posterized. --Sebring12Hrs 20:18, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• @Jakubhal: @Sebring12Hrs:  Done Igor123121 13:57, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support after PC it's acceptable and good quality --Gower 07:55, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment Yes but there are artifacts in the sky, as usual with your pictures. --Sebring12Hrs 09:03, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry - artifacts per Sebring12Hrs and too dark. --GRDN711 16:52, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:45, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Outdoor_sculpture_"Owieczki",_1968_design._Bronisław_Chromy,_University_of_Agriculture_Faculty_of_Animal_Sciences,_24-28_Mickiewicza_Alley,_Kraków,_Poland.jpg

• Nomination Outdoor sculpture "Owieczki", 1968 design. Bronisław Chromy, University of Agriculture Faculty of Animal Sciences, 24-28 Mickiewicza Alley, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 17:43, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• A little bit unlucky composition in the center because of a bright pants behind the sheep. --Lvova 20:32, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

  @Lvova:  Done? --Igor123121 06:23, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. --Harmonide 00:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose @Harmonide: Please do not vote on top of the previous review until the dialogue is over, this is not very polite. As for me I don't think that these legs in red trousers that are still visible decorates the image, sorry. --Екатерина Борисова 02:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

  Well, more opinions - a good idea, because I agree with you, but not sure if my vote is oppose because of it. Lvova 09:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

  Sorry, Екатерина Борисова, I don't understand your point about my vote. Yesterday night was the first time I voted for Quality Images, so I did what I could based on what I understood. How should I have done it more properly? Harmonide 11:38, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

  The common sense is taking a look for a while and then the participating; you started to be very active without observation how it works, so do a little mess. As she wrote you, it's unpolite to vote when someone mentioned a problem and didn't accept a solution. Also, you use /discussions instead of /comments and put comments in CR in a little bit random place. Everything is fixable, but can be better if to be a little bit more attentive to what others do. Lvova 14:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

  @Harmonide: Usually, when we see a problem in someone's photo, we write the author a comment asking to work on the problem, and we wait for the author to respond. If the author has fixed the problem, the reviewer can promote the photo (or write another comment). But until the author of the photo responds to the reviewer, you should not promote his photo. In addition, you should not support photos that have already been promoted, it makes no practical sense. -- Екатерина Борисова 23:13, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Weak oppose The sculptures are well taken, but the crop at the top is quite tight. --Harlock81 19:02, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support The red pants are not obtrusive--KaiBorgeest 22:18, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   ----KaiBorgeest 22:18, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:20240514_Völklingen_Ironworks_04.jpg

• Nomination The artwork Defund the War Machine by Roadsworth on a roof in the Völklingen Ironworks --FlocciNivis 16:12, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• I think this tries to capture too much in one image, so neither the artwork nor the ironworks are high quality. --Tagooty 03:46, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Support There's something I like in this picture even if it's not perfect. It's quite immersive, it creates an atmosphere. It says something about the place. So not a remarkable shot, but a quality one in my eyes. --Harmonide 00:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose As explained in my comments above. --Tagooty 03:01, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment You can see it's a little curved at the bottom. It means that is a bit distorted. --Sebring12Hrs 16:54, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Sebring12Hrs 16:54, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2025,_Kraków,_Kamienica_Czerwona_w_Krakowie.jpg

• Nomination 2025, Kraków, Kamienica Czerwona w Krakowie --Igor123121 15:56, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• Needs to be straightened. --Gower 17:59, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

  @Gower:  Done :) --Igor123121 18:46, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality -- Spurzem 18:38, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose The exposure isn't very good to my eyes, and the guy's foot is cropped in the foreground. I'm not convinced on this one. Could easily be better. -- Harmonide (talk) 12:21, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, oppose per Haronide. If you get the opportunity, make another image of this Red Tenement House (Brendlarowski House) - tighter with minimal clutter. --GRDN711 04:31, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:46, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2024_Dom_czeladny_w_Podtyniu_(5).jpg

• Nomination Servants' house in Podtynie 3 by User:Jacek Halicki --Boston9
• Discussion
   Oppose The main object isn't focused, the sky is too bright. --Lvova 20:38, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
  I disagree, please discussion --Jacek Halicki 10:47, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Neutral The photo is sharp enough, but the sky and the roof of the outbuilding are too bright. I also would have placed the main subject deeper into the frame. All in all, the photo isn't bad, but in my opinion, it's not one that deserves to be recognized as a quality image. -- Spurzem 09:32, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Not so bad to me. --Sebring12Hrs 00:38, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support When I first reviewed it, I was about to promote it. I didn't do so because I was convinced that it was going to be a controversial promotion. It doesn't look burnt to me. The detail and everything else is good. I don't think it's very pretty, but QI pictures don't have to be pretty.--Lmbuga 00:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sky is burnt out, same for small parts of the metal roof. The (more or less) dark building in front of the bright white sky just isn't looking good. --Plozessor 03:48, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Bright sky but not overexposed IMHO, overall just over the bar, I believe --Poco a poco 22:12, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sky is burnt out, CA not fixed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gower (talk • contribs) (@Gower: !!! Lvova 20:03, 11 October 2025 (UTC))

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → More votes?   --Gower 19:50, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Timetable (day 8 after nomination)

• Mon 06 Oct → Tue 14 Oct
• Tue 07 Oct → Wed 15 Oct
• Wed 08 Oct → Thu 16 Oct
• Thu 09 Oct → Fri 17 Oct
• Fri 10 Oct → Sat 18 Oct
• Sat 11 Oct → Sun 19 Oct
• Sun 12 Oct → Mon 20 Oct
• Mon 13 Oct → Tue 21 Oct
• Tue 14 Oct → Wed 22 Oct